So when the Muslim terrorist entity - Hamas - sends their missiles into Israel, the world community could care less. That socialist gathering of thug nations - the UN - expresses no outrage nor do they demand a cease fire from Hamas.
Let a non-Muslim country defend itself and then the cries of outrage start flowing. The usual pictures of children spread like diarrhea down an Iranian oil pipe.
In the global community protecting a nation from terrorism is seen as something bad - wrong - un-compassionate - evil, while the true enemy gains support and strength.
Want a true peace? Eliminate the threat - totally. No negotiations - why negotiate to have terrorist neighbors that live for your destruction?
In case you still can't grasp the concept let me put it like this: Kill every Hamas. Only then will there be a real chance for peace. Just think of Hamas as gangrene invading your body. I think you want to remove every bit of it - forever.
Showing posts with label Obamaism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obamaism. Show all posts
Monday, December 29, 2008
Monday, November 03, 2008
Either way - I Win!
Either way the election goes, I win.
If McCain/Palin wins then I win because I can have the satisfaction our country won't be under control by a smooth talking cocaine lying street hustler that failed to deliver on the promises to those in Illinois when he was a state senator (his turf he promised change for now has a murder rate exceeding that of New York City and Los Angeles).
If Obama/Biden wins then I will have at least 2 years of I TOLD YOU SO of posts where I can reference my past posts and predictions when the great Obamaization takes place. No doubt he will fail and this gangster is not one to take responsiblity - he will simply blame everyone else for his failures. Some examples of I TOLD YOU SO I will be rubbing into your face:
When Barack Obama increases your utility bills (because of his master plan to tax power industries into bankruptcy) so much you'll be paying them with your almost maxed-out credit cards - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When unemployment reaches into the double-digits because of Obama and the Pelosi/Reid and liberal Congress attack on CHUMPS (the successful) - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO! Some recent highlights of the Obama/Pelosi/Reid Liberal-controlled Congress this is already happening (doesn't include the million workers laid off since Democrats took control 2 years ago):
When Obama's push to unionize free enterprise businesses in America, and those businesses are no longer competitive - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama nationalizes homosexuality, breaks the moral definition of marriage, promotes teaching homosexuality even to America's little children - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama and his Liberals infest the judicial system with anti-Constitutional judges that take away your gun rights, rule for homosexual scouts leaders, disallow the majority of voter's in a single rule, re-institute racial preferences, etc. - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama turns prisons from a punishment to be avoided - a deterrent, into social training programs and hug-a-thug centers - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama empowers government to judge what is free-speech and what is hate and bring his federal police upon you (Obama plans to pack the criminal section of Justice's Civil Rights Division with African-American prosecutors, and make "hate crime a priority") - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
(Ever notice that only whites are accused/convicted of hate crimes but blacks are not?)
When Obama/Biden/Pelosi/Reid/et.al continue to force banks to lend to people that can't qualify for loans and continue to force everyone else to cover (co-sign) these bad loans - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
(Ever notice in the "bail out" Liberals didn't remove that practice but Republicans removed the the huge donation Liberals wrote in to give to ACORN - your BILLIONS of tax monies?)
Oh yeah - these are just of tiny fraction of what Barack Obama has instore for you (in spite of his promises, his senior advisors have disclosed Obama doesn't plan to keep his lofty promises!) - and I will be there to say
If McCain/Palin wins then I win because I can have the satisfaction our country won't be under control by a smooth talking cocaine lying street hustler that failed to deliver on the promises to those in Illinois when he was a state senator (his turf he promised change for now has a murder rate exceeding that of New York City and Los Angeles).
If Obama/Biden wins then I will have at least 2 years of I TOLD YOU SO of posts where I can reference my past posts and predictions when the great Obamaization takes place. No doubt he will fail and this gangster is not one to take responsiblity - he will simply blame everyone else for his failures. Some examples of I TOLD YOU SO I will be rubbing into your face:
When Barack Obama increases your utility bills (because of his master plan to tax power industries into bankruptcy) so much you'll be paying them with your almost maxed-out credit cards - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When unemployment reaches into the double-digits because of Obama and the Pelosi/Reid and liberal Congress attack on CHUMPS (the successful) - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO! Some recent highlights of the Obama/Pelosi/Reid Liberal-controlled Congress this is already happening (doesn't include the million workers laid off since Democrats took control 2 years ago):
- Circuit City closing 155 stores, laying off THOUSANDS
- Cleveland Steel Plant lays off 400 workers
- Bell Helicopter laying off 500 workers
- Motorola to lay off 3,000 workers
When Obama's push to unionize free enterprise businesses in America, and those businesses are no longer competitive - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama nationalizes homosexuality, breaks the moral definition of marriage, promotes teaching homosexuality even to America's little children - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama and his Liberals infest the judicial system with anti-Constitutional judges that take away your gun rights, rule for homosexual scouts leaders, disallow the majority of voter's in a single rule, re-institute racial preferences, etc. - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama turns prisons from a punishment to be avoided - a deterrent, into social training programs and hug-a-thug centers - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
When Obama empowers government to judge what is free-speech and what is hate and bring his federal police upon you (Obama plans to pack the criminal section of Justice's Civil Rights Division with African-American prosecutors, and make "hate crime a priority") - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
(Ever notice that only whites are accused/convicted of hate crimes but blacks are not?)
When Obama/Biden/Pelosi/Reid/et.al continue to force banks to lend to people that can't qualify for loans and continue to force everyone else to cover (co-sign) these bad loans - I will be there to say I TOLD YOU SO!
(Ever notice in the "bail out" Liberals didn't remove that practice but Republicans removed the the huge donation Liberals wrote in to give to ACORN - your BILLIONS of tax monies?)
Oh yeah - these are just of tiny fraction of what Barack Obama has instore for you (in spite of his promises, his senior advisors have disclosed Obama doesn't plan to keep his lofty promises!) - and I will be there to say
I TOLD YOU SO!
Friday, October 31, 2008
Hope You Like Tents!
Planning ahead is wise, and with the potential of a totally liberal Congress and President on the horizon - it might be a good idea to prepare for adjustments. You've seen just a glimpse of their effects for the past 2 years of the New Progressive Democrat controlled Congress (are you better off than you were 2 years ago?)
In spite of what verbal rhetoric (lies) of Obama you want to believe there are constants in the universe. Here's some old but proven math you best know:
- + unionization = + unemployment
- + unionization = + company closures
- + unionization = + living costs
- + unionization = + disruption
- + gov. programs = + taxes
- No school choice = - technical skills
- - tech skills = + outsourcing
PelOsi, Obama, Reid
The newProgressive Democratic Party!
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Obamaism Q/A - Sharing
Question: You say an Obama government will force sharing. What's wrong with government doing what is decent?
Answer: Sharing is good. I share and it sounds like you share too. The problem is any government that takes our money and decides who it should share it with. Wouldn't you rather share with whom you decide instead of government making that choice? Do you really want government to dictate what is decent and what is not?
Question: I'm working two jobs and going to school. Someday I'm sure I will be worth much more than I am now but in the mean time what's wrong with Barack Obama making people that are rich help me out?
Answer: First, congratulations on your choice to improve your financial situation on your own. You sound like you are a capable person and really don't need handouts, or am I wrong? Barack Obama has continuously shifted his threshold of what "rich" is. A year ago it was $1 million. Later, that got cut in half to $500K. In the past few months that was lowered to $250K. Two days ago "rich" is now defined as $150,000. At the current rate of decline "rich" will be everyone with an income of over $40K.
Question: I'm a healthy teen and this is my first election I get to vote in. What's so wrong with sharing wealth to help people have medical care? I know an older woman down the street that is overweight, smokes, drinks, and is now a diabetic and she will need healthcare.
Answer: Let me get this straight. You are healthy, don't smoke, you exercise and take care of your body. Contrast that will a person that makes the choice to damage thier body with cigarettes, eat too much, and not exercise. Let's put it this way - if you think a person that makes bad life choices should have someone else pay for their healthcare then by all means - you feel free to pay her bills! Consider it your part in sharing your wealth.
Question: I'm a student and we are rallying to get Obama elected because we think sharing is good for the Earth. I don't see it costing much and we are told oil companies and Wal-Mart are rich. Besides, it's sort of cool to have a black dude as President - MTV is for it.
Answer: Since you still live at home and your parents pay for your expenses you are too young to realize the impact of socialism upon Americans. Once you get older and have to pay your own way you will look back and wonder how you could have been so stupid and gullible.
Question: You sound racist because you don't want a black president. Don't you think Barack Obama is intelligent?
Answer: I go by a candidate's policies, the people they hang with (past and present), and what they have accomplished. Obama looses on all three criteria. For example, former President Clinton has revealed that when the Pelosi-controlled economy started falling apart Barack Obama didn't know anything about the economy and his wife - Hillary - was one of the top 5 consulted to bring him (Obama) up to speed on economics. Now really - does that sound like a person of intelligence?
Answer: Sharing is good. I share and it sounds like you share too. The problem is any government that takes our money and decides who it should share it with. Wouldn't you rather share with whom you decide instead of government making that choice? Do you really want government to dictate what is decent and what is not?
Question: I'm working two jobs and going to school. Someday I'm sure I will be worth much more than I am now but in the mean time what's wrong with Barack Obama making people that are rich help me out?
Answer: First, congratulations on your choice to improve your financial situation on your own. You sound like you are a capable person and really don't need handouts, or am I wrong? Barack Obama has continuously shifted his threshold of what "rich" is. A year ago it was $1 million. Later, that got cut in half to $500K. In the past few months that was lowered to $250K. Two days ago "rich" is now defined as $150,000. At the current rate of decline "rich" will be everyone with an income of over $40K.
Question: I'm a healthy teen and this is my first election I get to vote in. What's so wrong with sharing wealth to help people have medical care? I know an older woman down the street that is overweight, smokes, drinks, and is now a diabetic and she will need healthcare.
Answer: Let me get this straight. You are healthy, don't smoke, you exercise and take care of your body. Contrast that will a person that makes the choice to damage thier body with cigarettes, eat too much, and not exercise. Let's put it this way - if you think a person that makes bad life choices should have someone else pay for their healthcare then by all means - you feel free to pay her bills! Consider it your part in sharing your wealth.
Question: I'm a student and we are rallying to get Obama elected because we think sharing is good for the Earth. I don't see it costing much and we are told oil companies and Wal-Mart are rich. Besides, it's sort of cool to have a black dude as President - MTV is for it.
Answer: Since you still live at home and your parents pay for your expenses you are too young to realize the impact of socialism upon Americans. Once you get older and have to pay your own way you will look back and wonder how you could have been so stupid and gullible.
Question: You sound racist because you don't want a black president. Don't you think Barack Obama is intelligent?
Answer: I go by a candidate's policies, the people they hang with (past and present), and what they have accomplished. Obama looses on all three criteria. For example, former President Clinton has revealed that when the Pelosi-controlled economy started falling apart Barack Obama didn't know anything about the economy and his wife - Hillary - was one of the top 5 consulted to bring him (Obama) up to speed on economics. Now really - does that sound like a person of intelligence?
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Obamaism Q/A - Achievement
Question: I am a new (legal) immigrant and came to America to accomplish my dreams - that what I might accomplish has no limits. I can't vote yet but won't both Senator McCain and Senator Obama make sure I have my chance?
Answer: No. With a President McCain the sky is the limit - in other words, you are free to achieve without constraint. With a President Obama you will have a ceiling - $250,000. After that you will be penalized for achieving more.
Question: I am a black female and currently attend a private university. I have achieved my 4.0 average on my own without anyone's help. I don't want nor do I need any handouts or special help. I plan to attend a predominate university for my PhD., but not sure if either candidate would matter at this point - suggestions?
Answer: With a President McCain you are free to accomplish your dreams. With a President Obama your dream slot at the university you are qualified for might be taken by an unqualified Mexican or even an unqualified black. Once you have proven yourself to be self-relient and a person that can accomplish you will have to step to the back of the line - even color won't matter.
Question: Senator Obama promised my taxes would not go up and he would tax everyone that makes over $250,000. Why should I vote for Senator McCain?
Answer: A President McCain will lower your taxes. At the best, a President Obama will keep your federal tax bill the same - not lower. You will also find yourself paying more state taxes if you live in a blue state. Also, if Congress gets more Democrats then they will raise your taxes directly or indirectly.
Question: Which candidate promotes divisions based on class, income, race, etc.?
Answer: Senator Obama has already started to define what is "rich", what is "middle-class", etc. His party is responsible for government defining what is hate and what is not hate - via "hate crime legislation". Senator Obama has already stated for the record he will re-enstate affirmative action - a racially motivated and racially selective scheme where his big government forces a school or employer to accept unqualified individuals based on their race.
Question: Which candidate has Americans and America as their priority and not special interest groups like unions and anti-American radicals?
Answer: Only John McCain.
Answer: No. With a President McCain the sky is the limit - in other words, you are free to achieve without constraint. With a President Obama you will have a ceiling - $250,000. After that you will be penalized for achieving more.
Question: I am a black female and currently attend a private university. I have achieved my 4.0 average on my own without anyone's help. I don't want nor do I need any handouts or special help. I plan to attend a predominate university for my PhD., but not sure if either candidate would matter at this point - suggestions?
Answer: With a President McCain you are free to accomplish your dreams. With a President Obama your dream slot at the university you are qualified for might be taken by an unqualified Mexican or even an unqualified black. Once you have proven yourself to be self-relient and a person that can accomplish you will have to step to the back of the line - even color won't matter.
Question: Senator Obama promised my taxes would not go up and he would tax everyone that makes over $250,000. Why should I vote for Senator McCain?
Answer: A President McCain will lower your taxes. At the best, a President Obama will keep your federal tax bill the same - not lower. You will also find yourself paying more state taxes if you live in a blue state. Also, if Congress gets more Democrats then they will raise your taxes directly or indirectly.
Question: Which candidate promotes divisions based on class, income, race, etc.?
Answer: Senator Obama has already started to define what is "rich", what is "middle-class", etc. His party is responsible for government defining what is hate and what is not hate - via "hate crime legislation". Senator Obama has already stated for the record he will re-enstate affirmative action - a racially motivated and racially selective scheme where his big government forces a school or employer to accept unqualified individuals based on their race.
Question: Which candidate has Americans and America as their priority and not special interest groups like unions and anti-American radicals?
Answer: Only John McCain.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Obamaism Q/A - Business
Question: I have a growing business and I'm concerned that if Barack Obama is elected along with a greater liberal majority in Congress I will be faced with greater taxes. Are my concerns real?
Answer: Yes. No time in history have Democrats been business-friendly when they control both the executive and legislative branches.
Question: Will total control by Democrats in D.C. increase my overhead, and if so - is there anything I can do?
Answer: Absolutely to both parts. You will face increased taxes and new fines for not following the new mandates of Obamaism. I would advise you look over your employees and pick the most productive 70% and terminate the remaining 30%. This will happen with a great number of business because their survival depends on it.
Question: My company is not unionized but I've heard Democrats want to force my employees to become union members - is that true.
Answer: Not totally. Barack Obama and the Democrat Congress will require you be a unionized company if you plan to do business with the Federal Government. If you don't plan to get any government contracts you will still have to be concerned about a tiny few employees that will, with union tactics, try and force employees into unionizing. This is a top priority with Barack Obama and most Democrats.
Question: My company went public and is growing rapidly, but I'm concerned with the threat of increasing government interference and taxes. I'm also concerned that if the union workers strike Barack Obama and his Democrat Congress will prohibit me from hiring replacement workers. What are my options?
Answer: Strongly consider incorporating in another country. As Democrats have continued to destroy the business climate the USA is loosing their rank of best country to do business. Currently, the top 3 are (in order) Denmark, Ireland, and Finland.
Question: Shouldn't I feel concern if I lay off employees in order to keep the business afloat?
Answer: Did your devoted employees elect politicians that were concerned with freeing businesses to grow, allowing free enterprise to prosper as well as the employees, or did they elect politicians that want to punish success?
Question: My business did much better in the first 6 years of the Republican administration than in the last 2 years. Why is that?
Answer: Because Congress controls all things regarding laws, mandates, money, budget, taxes, etc. The Executive office can submit requests but nothing more. Your misery is because Congress has been under Democrat control for the last 2 years.
Answer: Yes. No time in history have Democrats been business-friendly when they control both the executive and legislative branches.
Question: Will total control by Democrats in D.C. increase my overhead, and if so - is there anything I can do?
Answer: Absolutely to both parts. You will face increased taxes and new fines for not following the new mandates of Obamaism. I would advise you look over your employees and pick the most productive 70% and terminate the remaining 30%. This will happen with a great number of business because their survival depends on it.
Question: My company is not unionized but I've heard Democrats want to force my employees to become union members - is that true.
Answer: Not totally. Barack Obama and the Democrat Congress will require you be a unionized company if you plan to do business with the Federal Government. If you don't plan to get any government contracts you will still have to be concerned about a tiny few employees that will, with union tactics, try and force employees into unionizing. This is a top priority with Barack Obama and most Democrats.
Question: My company went public and is growing rapidly, but I'm concerned with the threat of increasing government interference and taxes. I'm also concerned that if the union workers strike Barack Obama and his Democrat Congress will prohibit me from hiring replacement workers. What are my options?
Answer: Strongly consider incorporating in another country. As Democrats have continued to destroy the business climate the USA is loosing their rank of best country to do business. Currently, the top 3 are (in order) Denmark, Ireland, and Finland.
Question: Shouldn't I feel concern if I lay off employees in order to keep the business afloat?
Answer: Did your devoted employees elect politicians that were concerned with freeing businesses to grow, allowing free enterprise to prosper as well as the employees, or did they elect politicians that want to punish success?
Question: My business did much better in the first 6 years of the Republican administration than in the last 2 years. Why is that?
Answer: Because Congress controls all things regarding laws, mandates, money, budget, taxes, etc. The Executive office can submit requests but nothing more. Your misery is because Congress has been under Democrat control for the last 2 years.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)