I go to Cao's Blog often. She isn't afraid to remind us of the real issues that can end up being our undoing unless something is done by the good people.Reading it today and paging down I came across a post she has titled 1963 Communist Goals. These are not her words but she (as usual) provides the evidence of their existence. In this case the words were entered into the Congressional record in 1963 by Albert Herlong, Jr. (a Floridian who served in Congress from 1949-1969). Anyone recognize any of those goals on the list? Anyone think some number of them have already been accomplished?
Read her main post as well and the must-read terrorism and Islam, especially the series Jihad comes to Smalltown, USA. Is anyone awake out there? Anyone care about our country more than American Idol or who's dating Paris Hilton? Hello? HELLO? HELLLLLLOOOOO?
4 comments:
Hey, Maddie. Since when did you change your calling card to justadog? Anyway, thanks for the linkage and recognition. You're a peach. I DO try to put out what's really happening, in spite of peoples' PC objections. IMO, we're facing some real trouble if we don't keep these things at the forefront of our minds. Love ya. Cao.
Seems like a poor excuse to limit your information resources - "I usually find that she is 100% pro Bush". I think if you scan through her posts you will actually find very little Bush and more of actual facts - facts that you or I can check out for ourselves. Cao does her research and it shows. Of course he will express her opinions on such research results but so what?
Now if you have a disagreement on facts then put forth your counter-evidence. I think "you people" that have some odd-ball hatred of Bush better listen to what is being said by those you label as "pro-Bush" since they put him into office by a huge majority despite all the hate the other side generated and despite fat slob Moore (did you actually buy his DVD?).
This is one reason I'm an independant - I'm free to search for facts from both sides without some guilt trip that I'm betraying this party or that party. Are you?
Sorry pundit, but some of your Bible quotes are figurative, like "I came not to send peace but a sword" - figurative, not a superficial call for some holy war. "fight the good fight of faith" and to "put on the whole armour of God." - again, purely figurative. Sort of like a family member dead from cancer and the relatives saying what a "good fight to live" that person made. Do you really envision a physical combat? I think you're really getting low on facts to try to convince anyone of your point.
So are you saying that it is wrong to focus on the Islam "faith" as a possible identifier of a terrorist? Of course, not exactly 100% of terrorists acts are carried out by an Islamic extremist - well, I'm not sure on that... Hmmm. Well if not 100% it is pretty high.
Let's say you were the CIA chief. Would you put your claims that you try to convince us of here into action and tell your analysis’s to drop any and all Islamic identifiers and instead focus on Catholics or Hindus or some other religion? I'd be more impressed if you had factual data of how many terrorists have been Islamic and how many have not.
What we are doing now is not much different than the papal actions to convert or eliminate the heathen during the dark ages. - sorry, but it is a hell of a lot different. Walk away from the dusty books someday and smell the real world!
So if you find a post in someone's blog that's not about politics, is it really safe to assume that all that person is concerned about is Hollywood and entertainment? And that - that person has no interest in politics or even cares about what's going on in the world?
Is it not possible that a person can have more than one interest?
You couldn't be that simple minded, could you?
Post a Comment