They call this coward turd "al Qaeda No. 3", a.k.a. Abu Faraj al-Libbi. He was a big catch for Pakistan and the Pakistan government deserves well earned praise.Sources told CNN that al-Libbi will likely undergo a joint interrogation by U.S. and Pakistani officials. A source who has witnessed Pakistani interrogation methods said extreme psychological pressure was a hallmark of the intense sessions.
I would hope that more than just psychological pressure be used. A wishy-washy civilization will have put upon itself some guilt complex that limits the effectiveness of obtaining critical information and puts the lives of innocent people at grave risk. The hallmark of an advanced society would use any and all measures necessary to extract every piece of information as required. The advanced society is analytical and can accurately weight the near and far term implications of action vs. inaction. Unfortunately much of the modern world lives in some guilt-driven emotional state of being and are afraid to advance.
As these Islamic thugs are gathered up wouldn't it be nice to see these bomb-love'n cowards that live in caves like disease infested rats be spread out - small explosives placed strategically on various locations of their bodies - then detonated one-by-one? Such a public execution really should be carried out by Muslim women, don't you think? Think CBS would cover it?
6 comments:
Hmmm - I'm not sure what that comment about democracy has to do with this post, but I'm talking about cold blooded killers whose sole purpose is to kill innocent people (cutely called terrorism).
If you like to refer back to our beginnings then perhaps quote how criminals were appropriately treated back then.
we purport to have gone to Iraq to promote democracy - please check the documented history of why the USA went there, along with the full history of resolutions in the UN. "Promote democracy" was not a "why". Also, I'd hope the hell the protection of our citizens do not rest on the principles of the Geneva Conventions from 1949. Our Constitution includes in the very first sentence ..secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.... So the question is - what are we willing to do to accomplish that security? Should we allow any other documents, especially foreign documents even if someone representing the USA at the time signs them, over ride the security and blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity? It seems like this is what you are trying to argue for - or perhaps I misunderstand your comment?
I'd rather have this debate on a post that pertains to the "we found none so there must never have been any" topic - it has nothing to do with this post, sorry.
Take the focus off of what the terrorists do and put it on EEVVVIIILLL capitalists.
I am starting to agree with the book that's entitled Liberalism is a Mental Disorder.
Try to focus. I think there are medications for not being able to focus, like Ritlen. You should have it looked at because people generally have difficulty functioning in life who can't. Great post, Maddie.
Oh and BTW, all this focus on WMD and ignoring what Saddam's regime did for over 35 years is another function of that mental disorder. Saddam deserved to be dethroned and the whole area needs a reality check. This is much more than about WMD. This is about opposing terrorism, and if you don't know about Saddam's connection with funding terrorists, you should go here and have a read.
The President said: We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them.
Saddam Hussein was doing that. Nuff said.
I love it when people bring up the Geneva convention. Can someone show me the signatures of the various terrorists groups on that document? No? Then shut up. The Geneva convention is an agreement between civilized peoples in the event of war. Terrorists are not civilized and barely qualify to be people.
Oh, it's so bad that the US would dare to use psychological torture -- things like sleep depravation -- but apparently Pundit and others have no problem with terrorists raping, beheading, burning, and other types of physical torture. Pundit, your posts here show that you clearly hate American and Americans, and love terrorists. Why? Because you actually believe that it's worse for Americans to deprive someone of sleep to save American lives than for terrorists to bomb and gas tens of thousands of people. You are sick.
I'm with JustaDog -- the Americans are being too nice to this scum if they're only using some mild psychological torture.
Thanks for the posts and support Cao and Ogre. I do know Pundit personally and know he is very much an American. I think it is more the airwaves are permeated with the common thread that America is responsible for anything bad. I think the Geneva Convention crap got an upsurge with the prison exploits in Iraq - fully exploited by (mostly) democrats in an attempt to embarrass our country and to make us look worse than the terrorist we go after.
There are many in this country that has their focus on “reality” TV programs (or some other trivial focus) and not on the reality that is happening in the world. Treaties are worthless as well, since I know of no treaty with terrorists. Treaties are not to over ride the very basic principles of our Constitution: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. No where in the Constitution does it mention any limitations to achieve those basic principles, nor does it specify any portion can or will be over ruled by a treaty with a foreign power.
Many still have so much to learn.
Post a Comment