Monday, August 01, 2005

    Were You Duped To Believe a Terrorist?


    Islamic extremist Hussain Osman, aka, Isaac Hamdi said he carried out his failed terrorist attack because "the bombs were meant to draw attention to anger over the war in Iraq and not to kill anyone.". Liberals and socialist will love this terrorist - the words of this terrorist gives them (in their mind) justification that President Bush is the cause for terrorism (despite the fact terrorism attacks have occurred before either Bush's presidency and will continue after). Will smarter folks believe the word of a terrorist?
    He was photographed running from the scene of where he placed his explosives. If they were not meant to kill, why did he feel he had to run - unless he knew there would be ripping of flesh of innocent women and children as well as males?
    His innocent little unexploded bombs (16 of them found in a car) had sharp heavy duty short nails surrounding the outer casing. Do you believe this construction resembles an innocent little fire cracker to simply meant to draw attention?
    From a news article titled London bombers 'had 16 unexploded bombs':
    Exclusive pictures obtained by the US network show some of the bombs flat-packed like pancakes, while others were packed with nails to use as shrapnel.
    If you believe the word of this terrorist then I'd really have to ask: Where's Your Brain!? It's well know terrorist SOP to, upon capture, say whatever you can to do as much psychological damage, often via the media channels, to the infidel as possible. Well he was captured, and he followed the terrorist SOP - were you DUMB enough to fall for it?

    8 comments:

    JustaDog said...

    Some comments on this post were deleted when I changed the comment options last night. I sometimes post the afternoon or night before and post-date the post. In such case I don't like comments appearing before the intended showing of the post (although when I do so, obviously some will see it). If you don't like my policy then don't come back - simple huh?

    For you in particular I've deleted posts where you try to preach Taoism, and my blog is not a preaching platform for you - use your blog (which hardly anyone reads).

    The most recent comment you left for this post had nothing to do with the post - so comments that are not post-related are deleted. If you don't like my policy then don't come back - simple huh?

    Some anonymous posts I delete if they are mean and the person is a coward not to identify themselves. Again, if you don't like that then don't come back.

    If you have problems elsewhere you can contact the support people at Blogger. The services are free and I can't complain like you do.

    JustaDog said...

    Pundit - very good points! Thank you for your rational thought as well.

    trey - your comment was deleted again since it had nothing to do with the post. Will you ever grasp the concept?

    The Rambling Taoist said...

    Pundit,
    I think you have a much better handle on this overall issue than MOST people who write for or comment on this blog!!

    JustaDog said...

    However pundit, I would add that even if the USA were to pull totally out of the Middle East region that would not stop the Islamic extremists from wanting to destroy the USA, kill all Americans, etc. Although I really don't condone the USA playing police throughout the world (just like I don't condone the USA from babysitting the rest of the world with $$$), there is no justification for blowing up innocent women and children.

    JustaDog said...

    Ahhh - now you're talk'n my language!

    But will we ever have a Ronnie again? 'fraid Bush is no Ronnie.

    Anonymous said...

    You have some good points, Pundit, but, one thing you forget in your insistence that terrorism did not start up until American "invasion" is that America and and the Western world supplied the middle East and Arabia with money for oil that it had never seen before. And instead of using all that delicious money to help their populations and upgrade their societies, they decided to to keep it in the hands of the few who live like kings, and spend it murdering everyone who didn't agree with them..like the Israelis, their neighbours, any internal religious sects they didn't like and of course, the Big Blame Taker: America.

    I agree with your opinion that the strike should have been fast and clean. However, with all the liberals in your country crying that Bush should have toed the UN line ,and acted "multilaterally", what the hell could you expect? Since Ronnie was Prez, the leftist media has gained great grounds in the minds of the average American (and Canadian, and European...)

    JustaDog said...

    Perhaps some Americans suffer from can't-see-the-forest-through-the-trees syndrom. I find Canadians often have a better grasp of the USA than some Americans!

    The Rambling Taoist said...

    Pundit,
    Again, I think you have a firm grasp on the overall situation. As you aptly stated, this is a most complicated issue and complicated issues are rarely solved by simplistic plans.