Who's The Real Enemy Of The USA?

I'm going to take a diversion from this blog and will post (about 2x/wk) on my newer blog with a different focus. I believe I have fallen into the same trap most Americans have fallen into. I'm not one to see conspiracies everywhere but after examining various historic facts and trends there is definitely something very serious going on that we are not aware of.

Generally speaking there does seem to be a trend from early to present:

• President Carter: (1) Befriended Yasser Arafat, a well-documented major (high-level) terrorist player, and helped secure Arafat a Nobel Peace Prize - legitimizing his (Arafat's) past terrorist efforts - albeit clouded in superficial humanitarianism. (2) Continues to meet with terrorist hierarchy such as Hamas. (3) Had no problem giving away an important American asset - the Panama Canal Zone. (4) Did not press Iran to release hostages - made a superficial "effort" to free them (which everyone knew about). (5) Provided money, training (including bomb training), and arms to Islamic forces in Afghanistan.
  
  
• President Clinton: (1) Ignored warnings about Bin Laden, a previous Saudi national, and the dangers he presented to the USA. (2) Turned his back while Saudi nationals trained in the USA for their 9/11 attack. (3) Had the CIA close offices in Germany, recall the operations officers - resulting in practically no intelligence and completely missing the Hamburg cell connection to 9/11 - most likely, intentionally. (4) Receives $10-$25 Million from Saudi Arabia (all but one of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals). (5) Receives over $25 Million from the "Children's Investment Fund Foundation" - located in London nearby the Muslim core and 2.6 miles from the Islamic Centre of England. (Financial support for terrorist activities are often shielded by humanitarian, child, poverty, AIDS, and other "aid".)
  
  
• President Bush (jr): (1) Invades Iraq - no connection to 9/11 - under pretense of WMDs. (2) Allows Iran to develop nuclear capabilities (one of his Axis of Evil nations). (3) Allows North Korea to develop and test a nuclear bomb (one of his Axis of Evil nations). (4) Dumps Billions of $$$ into foreign "aid" programs - increasing deficit to historic levels. (5) Continues to allow Saudi Arabia (and nearby Islamic countries) to invest and even control various US interests directly in the USA and abroad. (6) Extraordinary Constitutional rights violations on Americans - by both parties.
  

Soon-to-be President Obama? We know he thinks the US Constitution is "flawed" - his words. We know he has already been talking with Hamas and Iran. We know there is suppose to be a major event happen that we are suppose to trust his judgment on. Biden called this "Obama's test" from outside the USA. I believe Liberals will drive the USA so far into debt they will attempt to tell Americans that the only way out is some sort of globalization - I.E., throw out our Constitution as we know it. (This is just 1 aspect of what is being set up).

The biggest connection that goes back for decades with these leaders is the absolution of Saudi Arabia - as if they go out of their way to protect that oppressive Islamic country. Remember, all but 1 of the 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia - not Iran, not Iraq, not Syria, not Russia.

Almost as if planned the last 8 years have seen a huge increase of fighting between Americans that really hasn't gone much of anywhere. I believe this internal fighting of individuals, media, bloggers, etc. on superficial issues was planned as a distraction from addressing the real questions.

I also believe the global disasters are concocted illusions to gain increasing control and thus, less freedoms. From Pandemics to Global warming to AIDS to Global finance to terrorism - Americans have become so fearful they are willing to give up their money, their freedoms, and their futures.

So just look the other way, bury your head in a hole, hide under your pillow, continue to be fed by your favorite media outlet, stay glued to "reality" TV - just don't open your eyes and look around - you might see something you were not suppose to.

---

---

---

---

Revealed: Mailed Republican Party Census

Yesterday I received the Republican Party Census Document. I believe this is mailed to voters registered as Republican. I think issues related to the country should be open and without party lines, so here are a few of their questions (exact wording) and my public answers. I will label the sections too. (No, I don't send these things back. My money goes to Ron Paul - the only one with a history of following the Constitution).

HOMELAND SECURITY ISSUES

Q: Should Republicans do everything they can to prevent Liberal Democrats from repealing the USA Patriot Act and other important laws that help our intelligence agencies protect Americans?
A: Actually Democrats went farther by approving domestic spying. Both sides are responsible for legislating themselves into the private lives of citizens.

Q: Do you support the use of air strikes against any country that offers safe harbor or aid to individuals or organizations committed to further attacks on America?
A: No, since this would mean we would have to strike our own country. American politicians have done worse - by supplying money and military aid to countries and individuals and organizations that would like to see America attacked. We need to cut a lot of cords.

ECONOMIC ISSUES

Q: Should we make our fight against the Democrats' massive tax hikes a central part of the 2008 campaign?
A: No. Greatly cutting government, cutting spending, terminating gifts and donations that go into the billions of dollars each year to other countries need to be the focus. Terminate worthless government programs that exist only to suck trillions of dollars over the years without giving anything in return. These need to be the priorities. Without the waste government wouldn't need to tax as much.

Q: Should we continue working to permanently repeal the Death Tax?
A: It should be on the bottom of the priority list since it doesn't even apply to 96% of Americans. Focus on the issues that matter to the majority.

Q: Should Republicans renew the fight for a Balanced Budget Amendment?
A: Not until a greatly reduced government budget is determined. To set the current excessive budget as a model to balance is absurd.

DOMESTIC ISSUES

Q: Do you agree that we must stop illegal immigration?
A: Yes, but for the past 8 years status quo Republicans obviously have not - except Ron Paul.

Q: Should Republicans oppose Senator Clinton's one size fits all, government-run healthcare plan?
A: Government will never do what private industry can do better. Senator Clinton does not have ownership of this concept; it's a long time socialist concept.

SOCIAL ISSUES

Q: Do you think Congress should pass the Federal Marriage Amendment, protecting marriage as a union between one man and one woman?
A: Government should not legislate moral and religious issues.

Q: Do you support President Bush's initiatives to allow private religious and charitable groups to do more to help those in need?
A: The more private groups help the needy the less government will need to. As long as their charity does not go toward illegal immigrants or other criminals.

DEFENSE ISSUES

Q: Do you think U.S. troops should have to serve under United Nations commanders?
A: No.

Q: Do you agree that our top military priority should be fighting terrorists?
A: No - it should be the defense of American, especially along our border.

Q: Do you agree that sowing the seeds of democracy and freedom in the Middle East is a worthy goal?
A: Absolutely NO. This would be like Muslims invading America thinking converting us is a worthy goal.

America is destroying the freedom of the Middle East to choose their destiny.

In a country where the Koran is the final law, there can only be limited freedom within the confines of Islam. Such is the case in Iraq and American troops are dying for a cause (freedom and democracy) that is impossible to achieve.

The Secret Intentions Of Bush Et Al?

In 2002 President Bush announced a development fund called the Millennium Challenge Corporation. This is just another government business with the sole purpose of taking money from American taxpayers and giving it away to other countries - even Islamic ones. Formal creation of the MCC took place rather quietly in January 2004.

In 2004: Congress gave MCC $7,900,000 of American taxpayer's money to handout.

In 2005: Congress gave MCC $390,700,000 of American taxpayer's money. That's right - in one year the money funneled into the MCC increased by about 50 TIMES!

In 2006: Congress gave MCC $1,133,100,000 of American taxpayer's money. In case the digits confuse you it's OVER $1.1 BILLION dollars, triple from the previous year and about 150 TIMES the amount from its inception 2 years prior.

In 2007: Congress gave MCC $2,000,000,000+ of American taxpayer's money.

Determination of what country is eligible for hand outs and how much they should get are determined by MCC's Board of Directors - 9 people - with Bush's Condoleezza Rice at the top and Bush's Henry Paulson, US Treasury Secretary and member of the International Money Fund holding 2nd in command.

The picture above is a screen grab from the homepage of the MCA - prominently displaying the crescent and star from the Islamic country of Mauritania - elected by the MCC board to be eligible for America taxpayer monies. Mauritania is officially the "Islamic Republic of Mauritania". Think the latest uranium mining in Mauritania has anything to do with this?

More tomorrow…

Sacrificial Flesh

Today, another American soldier was murdered by a roadside bomb in Iraq, bringing the 2007 total dead to 853. The Constitution of Iraq was approved late 2005, which means American troops have been fighting the civil war of an Islamic Nation for over a year.

It really doesn't matter if you favored invading Iraq or not, or if you did then changed your mind. You might see Saddam's fall as good (yet without USA Constitutional merit), and you might see the fact Iraqis were finally allowed to freely vote in a democratic manner as a success (again, without USA Constitutional merit), but no matter how you stand there is no way to justify remaining in Iraq once the people freely made the choice to be a sovereign Islamic nation. Now I'll answer some questions.

The USA has not had another attack since 9/11 so obviously fighting in Iraq is worth it.
Well I guess people should eat more at McDonalds since their stock has almost doubled since 9/11 - proving as long as the hamburgers are eaten the USA has avoided another terrorist attack ($59.34 today vs. about $28 on 9/11).

But we are protecting Iraq.
Our Constitution does not direct politicians to send troops for such matters. We can defend ourselves if attacked, but it prohibits politicians from abusing their positions or starting wars and sacrificing troops on assumptions or political gain. It also does not legalize going to war based on United Nations resolutions (a global body dictating to the USA).

If we don't kill them there they will kill us here.
If that is so it will be because our borders are not secure, visa rules are a joke and not even tracked, illegal aliens (including most likely terrorists) are given welfare and medical care, both Republican and Democrat politicians want to legalize everyone that has entered the USA illegally (making terrorists here harder to find), etc. There is no way to know the makeup of millions of invaders because we lost the security of our own borders. Our troops should be on our own soil protecting us, not citizens of a Islamic nation.

But they started it with 9/11.
All the suspected hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Lebanon or Egypt. The country of Iraq was not represented, nor was any financing from Iraq connected with the attack or hijackers. Of the 19 hijackers, 15 were Saudi Arabian, 1 Egyptian, 1 Lebanese, and 2 from the United Arab Emirates.

So why didn't the USA attack Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia is the top oil producer and exporter in the world. There was a congressional report on the 9/11 attacks that detailed the Saudi support involved, but the FBI and the Bush administration blocked its release. There is a Saudi Money trail, yet the focus has been the "war on terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan, conveniently removing focus from Saudi Arabia.

So our soldiers continue to die for an Islamic civil war. Are these deaths of American fighters supported by our Constitutional? No, they are not. Ron Paul realizes this as well. America needs to return back to protecting America, abide by our Constitution, and then we can secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity - instead of surrendering them.

Thank A Liberal

Federal payments to Oregon might get vetoed by President Bush. Why? Because the defeatist liberals thought they would stick troop withdrawal conditions to this spending bill.

Yes, Liberals - in their usual political maneuvers to micro-manage the military in Iraq and Afghanistan - might have screwed Oregon using union-like extortion tactics. (Unions own Democrats in case you didn't already know)

So why did Liberals sabotage the chance for Oregon to receive this money?

Because they are Liberals and they don't care about anyone else - they care only for their agenda.

Lane County residents - make sure you still sign the anti-income tax petition tomorrow!

My Predictions For 2007

The coming New Year is just days away, so this will be my last post this year. I wish to impart my predictions of what 2007 will look like. Have a happy, safe, and prosperous New Year!

Saddam Hussein - You don't need to worry about 2007, but you can dangle (pun intended) with the knowledge that President Bush outlasted you. UPDATE: Prediction confirmed (uncensored footage)!

Air America - All but gone (a station in Madison, WI remains) will not be making a comeback, to the sadness of those liberals that feed on negative waves - especially fabricated. Poor Al Franken, President Bush outlasted you too.

Muslim Terrorists - Will become empowered more than ever thanks to CAIR and the liberal courts of the USA. More of our taxs are going to pay for brainwashing sessions of government employees to "understand" the Muslim "needs". Expect more lawsuits for any infidel "abusing" Islam - something the Muslim World League now wants. Gee - I wonder if this little blog will be attacked by CAIR someday, LOL. To the Grand Muppet Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Asheikh: I will continue to expose your "religion" as the deadly, murdering, and oppressive crap that it is. Don't even try and suppress my freedom of speech!

Hollywood - Expect the makings of some new movies like Saddam The Movie, Barack Obama and his Gay Church Membership, Barack Obama - Connected to the Mob, My Favorite Illegal Alien, Union Control - Deal or No Deal (ka boom)?

Taxes - since the new Democrats will hold the power of the budget expect your taxes to go up, and up, and up. This increase will be directly tax hikes, removing tax deductions and credits (which will make you pay more taxes), increased costs (like Democrats putting huge taxes on corporations - that will then simply raise their prices to you and me), increased fees, etc.

Government - expect local and federal government to get BIGGER than ever and have more control over people's lives than ever before. It will happen - it's a liberal government thing and there is nothing you can do (hey, you voted them in!)

Public Schools - expect more money to go into that black hole and dumber and less qualified students to come out (but they will be more homo sensitive). All the union teachers, janitors, and the ever-growing supporting staff will be happier with their growing paychecks, so not a total lost huh?

Social handouts - expect handouts to grow over budgets for police and infrastructure (roads, bridges, etc.). It is the liberal way.

Illegal aliens - Some cities will continue to take steps to rid their cities of illegals but expect these attempts to be overturned if taken to a liberal court judge. Liberal judges will continue to allow illegals (criminals) to have "US Constitutional Rights" when in fact they do not. It is the liberal way.

Christianity - expect the continuation of attempts to delete Christianity. Also expect Christianity to be redefined in the liberal courts - to embrace homosexuality and the liberal global agendas of eliminating capital punishment, open borders, huge social handouts (through taxpayers, not the Church of course). Expect increased murders by Muslims of Christians yet don't expect anyone to stop them or complain against them.

Gun Control - expect renewed attempts to disarm the good citizens of the USA with this new batch of liberals in control. It is a liberal thing. Conservatives are starting to take stronger action against liberals that try to disarm them - but more is needed.

Capital Punishment - already a joke in this country (except when Bush was governor of Texas) expect liberals to continue their attempts to protect the most dangerous criminals in society by pushing for the elimination of the death penalty. In states where it is legal don't expect much action when it comes to execution - there will be liberals nearby that will file all sorts of legal motions to delay or suspend the execution.

Gay Marriage - no such thing but expect courts to legalize homosexuals to carry a marriage certificate as if they were a normal man and woman. The people in every state have voted this a big NO, but homo activists push it to the courts and eventually get some liberal judge that will overturn the constitutionally empowered rights of We The People.

Saddam Appeals Are Oinked

Saddam tried but failed in his last attempt to appeal his death penalty. Tried and judged by Iraq law, in an Iraq court, by the Iraq judicial system, and given the sentence of death by hanging Saddam is just counting the days.

Every liberal by definition is against the death penalty. Even Ex-General Ramsey Clark, liberal defender of dictator Saddam said that Saddam Hussein's life is in President Bush's hands. I mean, how stupid is this liberal?

President Bush has nothing to do with Iraq law nor their justice system. Personally I think Clark made that statement to betray the United States in the eyes of the world - as if the trial was all America's doing.

Not at all. As a matter of fact Iraqis are volunteering by the hoards to execute Saddam. I really hope it's covered live - it's the best way to make the death penalty a deterrent, not like in the USA where executions are behind closed doors and the convict is gently put to sleep in the same way a beloved pet is put down. I say bring back public hangings!

2007 - Saddam Saddam, you ain't headed for heaven! - Uh humm uh humm - ooo yeah!

ACTION AGAINST NORTH KOREA!

It finally happened - it was just a matter of time. North Korea, one of the countries identified as a state sponsor of terrorism and now producer of nuclear weapons of mass destruction, has received the severe punishment that should have been dealt out long ago.

Everyone knows Kim II Sung is a crazy idiot with delusions of godhood - just like his Muslim counterpart in Iran, Mahmoud AhMADinejad.

The Clinton Administration failed to restrain Kim Sung and actually helped him build the reactors that now provide the weapon-grade fuel. The Bush Administration, albeit slow against the real world threats, finally showed the backbone needed against the maniacs of the world.

The severe punishment for threatening the world:

• NO iPods
• NO Cognac
• NO Rolex watches
• NO cigarettes
• NO artwork
• NO Harley Davidson motorcycles
• NO Jet Skis
• NO basketball gear
• NO plasma televisions
• NO Segway scooters
  

I feel so much safer.