Who's The Real Enemy Of The USA?

I'm going to take a diversion from this blog and will post (about 2x/wk) on my newer blog with a different focus. I believe I have fallen into the same trap most Americans have fallen into. I'm not one to see conspiracies everywhere but after examining various historic facts and trends there is definitely something very serious going on that we are not aware of.

Generally speaking there does seem to be a trend from early to present:

• President Carter: (1) Befriended Yasser Arafat, a well-documented major (high-level) terrorist player, and helped secure Arafat a Nobel Peace Prize - legitimizing his (Arafat's) past terrorist efforts - albeit clouded in superficial humanitarianism. (2) Continues to meet with terrorist hierarchy such as Hamas. (3) Had no problem giving away an important American asset - the Panama Canal Zone. (4) Did not press Iran to release hostages - made a superficial "effort" to free them (which everyone knew about). (5) Provided money, training (including bomb training), and arms to Islamic forces in Afghanistan.
  
  
• President Clinton: (1) Ignored warnings about Bin Laden, a previous Saudi national, and the dangers he presented to the USA. (2) Turned his back while Saudi nationals trained in the USA for their 9/11 attack. (3) Had the CIA close offices in Germany, recall the operations officers - resulting in practically no intelligence and completely missing the Hamburg cell connection to 9/11 - most likely, intentionally. (4) Receives $10-$25 Million from Saudi Arabia (all but one of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi nationals). (5) Receives over $25 Million from the "Children's Investment Fund Foundation" - located in London nearby the Muslim core and 2.6 miles from the Islamic Centre of England. (Financial support for terrorist activities are often shielded by humanitarian, child, poverty, AIDS, and other "aid".)
  
  
• President Bush (jr): (1) Invades Iraq - no connection to 9/11 - under pretense of WMDs. (2) Allows Iran to develop nuclear capabilities (one of his Axis of Evil nations). (3) Allows North Korea to develop and test a nuclear bomb (one of his Axis of Evil nations). (4) Dumps Billions of $$$ into foreign "aid" programs - increasing deficit to historic levels. (5) Continues to allow Saudi Arabia (and nearby Islamic countries) to invest and even control various US interests directly in the USA and abroad. (6) Extraordinary Constitutional rights violations on Americans - by both parties.
  

Soon-to-be President Obama? We know he thinks the US Constitution is "flawed" - his words. We know he has already been talking with Hamas and Iran. We know there is suppose to be a major event happen that we are suppose to trust his judgment on. Biden called this "Obama's test" from outside the USA. I believe Liberals will drive the USA so far into debt they will attempt to tell Americans that the only way out is some sort of globalization - I.E., throw out our Constitution as we know it. (This is just 1 aspect of what is being set up).

The biggest connection that goes back for decades with these leaders is the absolution of Saudi Arabia - as if they go out of their way to protect that oppressive Islamic country. Remember, all but 1 of the 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia - not Iran, not Iraq, not Syria, not Russia.

Almost as if planned the last 8 years have seen a huge increase of fighting between Americans that really hasn't gone much of anywhere. I believe this internal fighting of individuals, media, bloggers, etc. on superficial issues was planned as a distraction from addressing the real questions.

I also believe the global disasters are concocted illusions to gain increasing control and thus, less freedoms. From Pandemics to Global warming to AIDS to Global finance to terrorism - Americans have become so fearful they are willing to give up their money, their freedoms, and their futures.

So just look the other way, bury your head in a hole, hide under your pillow, continue to be fed by your favorite media outlet, stay glued to "reality" TV - just don't open your eyes and look around - you might see something you were not suppose to.

---

---

---

---

Sweet And Sour 2007

Goodbye 2007, you did my spouse and I well, but you were harsh on the USA. I hope 2008 will bring changes but as I watch events take place and I see the complacent attitudes people have I'm not very encouraged.

People rather consume sensory inputs that make them feel oh so cozy and good - something the reality of the disintegration of our free world can't currently provide. I will post just a couple of key examples of how the USA has reached new lows.

[1] A never-before historical transition - for over a solid year now America has surrendered billions of dollars and hundreds of precious lives in Iraq - for Allah. Yes, it's been over a year since Iraq established a constitution and at the top of their constitution they surrender final authority to the Koran. Simply read it for yourself, starting with the preamble:

We the sons of Mesopotamia, the land of the prophets, resting place of the holy imams, the leaders of civilization... Recognizing Allah's right upon us; obeying the call of our nation and our citizens; responding to the call of our religious and national leaders and the insistence of our great religious authorities...

We all know under the Koran there can NEVER be real freedom, only religious oppression -regardless of which flavor of Islam is in control.

So when you hear our resources, material and human, are consumed in the name of "Democracy" and "freedom" know that we are being lied to - by both parties. While America surrenders more billions in our taxes and lives of servicemen - Islam gets stronger, more demanding, and relentless.

1. In the short term watch for Islamic countries to make gains in territorial power.
2. In the long term watch the growing Islamic powers make some very bold moves - even to the taking of what remains of Rossiya, along with all their arsenal.
3. In the all term watch Islamic countries form relationships with non-Islamic nations for the sole purpose of the eventual subjugation of the USA
   

(Note: Iran went through the motions of arresting a man for starting a rumour Russian President Putin was going to be assassinated during a trip to Tehran, but in reality he was arrested (and will probably be killed eventually) for revealing part of Tehran's Islamic intentions.)

[2] The presidential candidates - each one of them - all participating in the media showcase Dancing With The Candidates. The potential leader of the most powerful country in the world now chosen by a beauty contest, all scripted by media moguls.

Add in some youtube (carefully screened of course) "participation" for spice (and ratings) and very short response windows for starts. Place "news" personalities in as judges to rate the players on style, form, attire, vocal expression, knowledge (what can be assessed in such a short time), potential attack points like racism, classism, illegal alienism, religionism, compassionism, socialism, droolism, etc. and hope the sponsors and audience doesn't waver. Sick, huh?

[3] Blurred vision - from both Republicans and Democrats seeing WMDs in Iraq that were not there, to Democratic Presidential Candidate Dennis Kuchinich having prophetic encounters with a UFO over the residence of wacko Shirley MacLaine's house, I see only one viable candidate with his feet on solid ground - Ron Paul.

---

The reality of Kwanzaaaaaaa - are you so gullible you observe it? OMG, LOL

---

Sacrificial Flesh

Today, another American soldier was murdered by a roadside bomb in Iraq, bringing the 2007 total dead to 853. The Constitution of Iraq was approved late 2005, which means American troops have been fighting the civil war of an Islamic Nation for over a year.

It really doesn't matter if you favored invading Iraq or not, or if you did then changed your mind. You might see Saddam's fall as good (yet without USA Constitutional merit), and you might see the fact Iraqis were finally allowed to freely vote in a democratic manner as a success (again, without USA Constitutional merit), but no matter how you stand there is no way to justify remaining in Iraq once the people freely made the choice to be a sovereign Islamic nation. Now I'll answer some questions.

The USA has not had another attack since 9/11 so obviously fighting in Iraq is worth it.
Well I guess people should eat more at McDonalds since their stock has almost doubled since 9/11 - proving as long as the hamburgers are eaten the USA has avoided another terrorist attack ($59.34 today vs. about $28 on 9/11).

But we are protecting Iraq.
Our Constitution does not direct politicians to send troops for such matters. We can defend ourselves if attacked, but it prohibits politicians from abusing their positions or starting wars and sacrificing troops on assumptions or political gain. It also does not legalize going to war based on United Nations resolutions (a global body dictating to the USA).

If we don't kill them there they will kill us here.
If that is so it will be because our borders are not secure, visa rules are a joke and not even tracked, illegal aliens (including most likely terrorists) are given welfare and medical care, both Republican and Democrat politicians want to legalize everyone that has entered the USA illegally (making terrorists here harder to find), etc. There is no way to know the makeup of millions of invaders because we lost the security of our own borders. Our troops should be on our own soil protecting us, not citizens of a Islamic nation.

But they started it with 9/11.
All the suspected hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Lebanon or Egypt. The country of Iraq was not represented, nor was any financing from Iraq connected with the attack or hijackers. Of the 19 hijackers, 15 were Saudi Arabian, 1 Egyptian, 1 Lebanese, and 2 from the United Arab Emirates.

So why didn't the USA attack Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia is the top oil producer and exporter in the world. There was a congressional report on the 9/11 attacks that detailed the Saudi support involved, but the FBI and the Bush administration blocked its release. There is a Saudi Money trail, yet the focus has been the "war on terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan, conveniently removing focus from Saudi Arabia.

So our soldiers continue to die for an Islamic civil war. Are these deaths of American fighters supported by our Constitutional? No, they are not. Ron Paul realizes this as well. America needs to return back to protecting America, abide by our Constitution, and then we can secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity - instead of surrendering them.

Halliburton - I'm Beginning to See The Light

You know the name Halliburton. You know the link of Dick Cheney as the former CEO of Halliburton. I've always wondered why Democrats kept Halliburton in the spotlight - along with a façade of suspicion and wrong doing. The only think I know about Halliburton is that it's a company that handles big assignments. But why have Democrats saturated our minds with rumors and propaganda and deceptions about a corporation?

Perhaps to hide the reality of their own corruption. Two examples:

• Democrat billionaire Oscar Wyatt, a Democrat Houston oil trader, has been indicted along with five others in a scheme to pay Iraqi officials millions of dollars in secret kickbacks under the UN oil-for-food folly. This Democrat as highly outspoken against the invasion into Iraq - with obvious reasons.
  
  Oil wasn't the only commodity this Democrat was involved with. In the mid 1990s this Democrat supplied GPS navigation systems to the Iraqi military. This Democrat trader had direct access to President Clinton (he's not speaking about it) and heads of foreign countries.
  
  I'm sure this Democrat was eager for attention to be focused on Halliburton, and he greased his Democratic politician friends to make sure it stayed that way.
  
  
• Democrat Dianne Feinstein, Senator from Mexifornia, rapidly abandoned her responsibilities with the Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee (MILCON) when a report came out linking her husband's ownership of two major defense contractors receiving BILLIONS of tax payers' dollars in construction contracts - approved and appropriated by her.
  
  While leading MILCON, Feinstein had ample warning of the medical-care meltdown. But Feinstein was not proactive on veteran's affairs.
  
  Feinstein abandoned MILCON as her ethical problems were surfacing in the media, and as it was becoming clear that her subcommittee left grievously wounded veterans to rot while her family was profiting from the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. It turns out that Blum also holds large investments in companies that were selling medical equipment and supplies and real estate leases-often without the benefit of competitive bidding-to the Department of Veterans Affairs, even as the system of medical care for veterans collapsed on his wife's watch.
  
  As of December 2006, according to SEC filings and www.fedspending.org, three corporations in which Blum's financial entities own a total of $1 billion in stock won considerable favor from the budgets of the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs:
  
  Boston Scientific Corporation: $17.8 million for medical equipment and supplies; 85 percent of contracts awarded without benefit of competition.
  
  Kinetic Concepts Inc.: $12 million, medical equipment and supplies; 28 percent noncompetitively awarded.
  
  CB Richard Ellis: The Blum-controlled international real estate firm holds congressionally funded contracts to lease office space to the Department of Veterans Affairs. It also is involved in redeveloping military bases turned over to the private sector.
  

I'm sure Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein was eager for attention to be focused on Halliburton and not her and her husband's profiteering operation.

Tony Blair's Wise Decision

The Democrats are having goose bumps over the news that Great Britain is withdrawing some troops from Iraq. Not a full withdrawn - more like a downsizing. Is this wise?

For Tony Blair it probably is. Great Britain's big mistake was allowing so many Muslims to migrate to their country. I guess Britain thought they were being compassionate and kind, but in reality they allowed themselves to be blinded by the reality of Islam.

Islamist Abu Izzadeen, well known terrorist, said (talking about Britain):

I'm born here... We have a British passport, and British citizenship but our allegiance is only to Islam.

... I have no allegiance to the British queen whatsoever and to the British society - in fact, if I see Mujahadin attack the UK, I always stand on the side of the Muslims - NEVER against the Muslims... Never! ... we always stand with the Muslims, regardless of the consequences."

If the British public don't like Shariah, it's going to be over their noses, whether they like it or not. It's going to be over Tony Blair's nose and George Bush's nose as well - and for your information - the British government knows that. That's why they're so terrified of Islamists. I don't believe in freedom. ... We don't believe in freedom as Muslims. We believe we are, and every action is, restricted with the Shariah rules....

This is the real Islam. This is how every Muslim thinks - each and every one. It's an irrevocable part of Islam. If they are not an active jihadist then they support the militant arm with money, public opinion, whatever it takes to achieve their ultimate goal.

Gear up your own country Tony Blair - before it's too late!

Enforce Responsibility - Iraq; Terrorist Plot

Most intelligent people know that freedom is not free. The reason there is a cost is because there are always bad people that don't want people to be free. Simple, huh?

As far as I'm concerned the "Iraq War" ended after Saddam Hussein was toppled and the multi-national force was free to roam and inspect for those illusive WMD (which I believe were transferred to Syria - at least the bulk of the chemical WMD). Everything after has been police enforcement. Sort of like police enforcement in gang-ridden Los Angeles, just a bit deadlier with Islamic motivations and not drugs.

I think it is impossible to have an "Iraq War" when Iraq now has an elected government and their own constitution. We are not at war with Iraq the nation, but merely providing extreme police protection and training of new Iraqi police and troops.

Now is the time for all Iraqis to take responsibility for (mainly) the USA providing police and security services. Time to start handing invoices - due upon receipt - for services rendered in the past, present, and future. So President Bush - please start sending invoices with these line items included:

• Lump-sum compensations to families that lost their child fighting for Iraqis
• Payment into a fund to provide forever support to those de-limbed, mutilated, and otherwise handicapped providing services to Iraq
• Total reimbursement for all armament used (and destroyed)
• Total reimbursement for all provisions required
• Payment for transportation for troops to cycle back to visit their families at least every 6 months
• And lots more - until every penny is paid back and every life, whether living or damaged, has been addressed.
  

Freedom is not free Iraq. Pay up or you're on your own.

---

---

When the TV is turned on this am CNN reports another terrorist plot stopped by MI5. They tell how the plot was to kidnap a British Muslim soldier and behead him, then put their video on the internet - presumably to generate fear and terror. At no time did they identify the terrorist suspects in any way.

I switch to Fox News and the same story - except their story wasn't censored like the CNN story. Fox clearly identified the terrorists as Islamic.

CNN censored the news per CAIR demands. Just read the CNN story online for yourself - sanitized to hide the identity of the suspects as being Muslims.

Fox News did not censor the news and is not submissive to CAIR demands.

Saddam Appeals Are Oinked

Saddam tried but failed in his last attempt to appeal his death penalty. Tried and judged by Iraq law, in an Iraq court, by the Iraq judicial system, and given the sentence of death by hanging Saddam is just counting the days.

Every liberal by definition is against the death penalty. Even Ex-General Ramsey Clark, liberal defender of dictator Saddam said that Saddam Hussein's life is in President Bush's hands. I mean, how stupid is this liberal?

President Bush has nothing to do with Iraq law nor their justice system. Personally I think Clark made that statement to betray the United States in the eyes of the world - as if the trial was all America's doing.

Not at all. As a matter of fact Iraqis are volunteering by the hoards to execute Saddam. I really hope it's covered live - it's the best way to make the death penalty a deterrent, not like in the USA where executions are behind closed doors and the convict is gently put to sleep in the same way a beloved pet is put down. I say bring back public hangings!

2007 - Saddam Saddam, you ain't headed for heaven! - Uh humm uh humm - ooo yeah!