Sandy Berger will plead guilty to taking documents. Now Dan Rather didn't cover the Sandy Berger classified documents theft so just to refresh the memory - Samuel Berger stole classified documents from the National Archives back in March, 2004. For still secret reasons only known to him, the Clintons, and their most trusted schemers Sandy destroyed some of those documents. Using excuses similar to Clinton's excuses for all sorts of offenses Sandy claims it was inadvertent - an honest mistake (that they found their way stuffed in the clothes he was wearing). What influence, power, threat do the Clintons have over people that they do what they do -
or else?
6 comments:
He quit claiming it was inadvertent once he plead guilty. He isn't going to be punished though.
True - in other words, he lied from the start. A Clinton-trend.
Hey great blog you've got here! Saw you over at TL. Anytime you feel the need to smack a Liberal upside the head, stop on by! They're used to it over there!
Darn! I was gonna blog on this but you said it all. Oh well. I'm sure Hillary will say something soon I can blog on...
Great picture!
Check out my site at http://vikingspirit.blogspot.com
Pretty nasty stuff, but for once, we Canadians have OUTDONE the US of A!!!
Get a load of the scandal erupting on Capitol Hill over approx 250 million tax dollars used to coerce and bribe Groupaction members to pay kickbacks to the Liberal Party, AND the separatist Parti Quebecois (whom PM at the time, Chretien was claiming to fight in the name of patriotism and national unity)Goes all the way to the top.
I'll tell you, the stench of corruption in this scandal outdoes anything the Clinton admin got up to. Difference being, we Canadians will prolly think it is OK. After all, lib owned media has most of us thinking that the Conservatives are "scary, dangerous folk". Better to have liars and charlatans in power, than someone who opposes gay marriage.
Cat
BTW: Hope you don't mind, I linked you on my site :)
Post a Comment