TAKING BACK AMERICA!

    Friday, April 01, 2005

    Sandy Sandy Sandy


    Sandy Berger will plead guilty to taking documents. Now Dan Rather didn't cover the Sandy Berger classified documents theft so just to refresh the memory - Samuel Berger stole classified documents from the National Archives back in March, 2004. For still secret reasons only known to him, the Clintons, and their most trusted schemers Sandy destroyed some of those documents. Using excuses similar to Clinton's excuses for all sorts of offenses Sandy claims it was inadvertent - an honest mistake (that they found their way stuffed in the clothes he was wearing). What influence, power, threat do the Clintons have over people that they do what they do - or else?

    8 comments:

    Tran Sient said...

    He quit claiming it was inadvertent once he plead guilty. He isn't going to be punished though.

    : JustaDog said...

    True - in other words, he lied from the start. A Clinton-trend.

    Theodore Craig said...

    Some people say that Clinton tried to cover up terrorist attacts like TWA 800 and Oklahoma city, as they would have ruined his legacy, that isn't all that great to begin with if you ask me...

    I agree with those people!

    For Clinton, admitting that there were Muslims who want nothing more than to kill Americans was out of the question!

    Anonymous said...

    Hey great blog you've got here! Saw you over at TL. Anytime you feel the need to smack a Liberal upside the head, stop on by! They're used to it over there!

    prying1 said...

    Darn! I was gonna blog on this but you said it all. Oh well. I'm sure Hillary will say something soon I can blog on...

    VikingSpirit said...

    Great picture!

    Check out my site at http://vikingspirit.blogspot.com

    Pundit said...

    The sad thing is that the Clinton Criminal Syndicate never pays for their lying, thievery, and cover-ups. Former CIA Agent Rober Baer's book "See No Evil" is a complete diary of Clinton-era crime and graft. He names names, lists dates, and holds back nothing. The only reason the book hasn't gotten the publicity equivelant to a Woodward fairy tale is because nobody wants to address the issue. If they ignore it, it will go away. Problem is, nobody has come forward to deny anything. Sometimes, though, I have to ask myself if maybe the U.S. didn't really deserve Clinton and his gang. After all, this population elected him not once but twice, and we damn near elected Al Gore.

    simoncat1010 said...

    Pretty nasty stuff, but for once, we Canadians have OUTDONE the US of A!!!
    Get a load of the scandal erupting on Capitol Hill over approx 250 million tax dollars used to coerce and bribe Groupaction members to pay kickbacks to the Liberal Party, AND the separatist Parti Quebecois (whom PM at the time, Chretien was claiming to fight in the name of patriotism and national unity)Goes all the way to the top.
    I'll tell you, the stench of corruption in this scandal outdoes anything the Clinton admin got up to. Difference being, we Canadians will prolly think it is OK. After all, lib owned media has most of us thinking that the Conservatives are "scary, dangerous folk". Better to have liars and charlatans in power, than someone who opposes gay marriage.

    Cat
    BTW: Hope you don't mind, I linked you on my site :)