- growing government
- growing handouts
- growing submission to global rule
- growing oppression to business
- growing oppression to individuals
- growing socialistic unions
- growing taxes
- shrinking freedoms
- shrinking self-responsibilities
- shrinking achievement standards
- shrinking jobs
- shrinking wallets
- shrinking leader of the world
Ron Paul represented the most conservative of candidate - with appeal to either party. Yet idiotic fools like Bill O'Reilly and our local Lars Larson and all the others wanted to pick obvious loosers primarily, I think, because of their religious affiliation.
This narrow vision of a candidate's religion has been a prime reason of the decline of those that seek self-determination and less government. It doesn't matter if you want to argue about it - this race has proven what I have always claimed.
Well now you have your choice of 3 liberals to choose from. In my mind if you couldn't see the future in Ron Paul, what he stood for, and where we could have been then you were:
- Too stupid to see
- and/or too lazy to research what he's been saying for years - especially regarding our economy
- and/or too mesmerized with a party lable and really don't care about policy
- and/or too entranced with religious affiliations to, again, realize policy issues - both short and long term
No comments:
Post a Comment