The article title in the British News Telegraph: Saddam's $2m offer to WMD inspector. The article starts with Saddam Hussein's regime offered a $2 million (£1.4 million) bribe to the United Nations' chief weapons inspector to doctor his reports on the search for weapons of mass destruction.Hmm, excuse me - but if Saddam never had any WMD's and he never was working on WMD's and he never had any intention of buying WMD's why would he be attempting to bribe UN weapons inspection officials to doctor their reports (not that it would be difficult to do that)???
More on this and the NY Times story revealing that there really were WMD's can be found here (requires free signup). An alternative is here. Guess some whiners can't call it a "Liars War" anymore huh?
3 comments:
They thought the robbery was staged by the owner, but when the reporters walked into the jewelry store after the robbery and saw no jewels remaining, they concluded there never were any jewels, therefore the jewelry store owner was innocent.
#1: Unlike Dan Rather I have not seen anyone speculate that their information was bogus or counterfit;
#2: No, this is "during-war" admissions - and more will come to light as more of those tons of documents taken in Iraq get translated.
#3: The "no jewels found" story is in answer to this. This type of "logic" is not logic - for example, if Saddam was never found does that mean he really didn't exist? The full story is not in on this one, and personally I don't think it will be until during or after Saddam is executed - gone for good. People there are still afraid while he is still alive.
"Cap on the bottle" - sorry, that is the biggest joke I've heard. There is no way a handful of people could have searched all possible above ground and under ground locations - including peoples houses, again, above and under ground. This logic is the same as saying that all possible archaeological sites must have been discovered since searching for such has been done for over a hundred years. And if you are wrong and all that you claim has not been found has either been transported out of the country in full or part? Can you prove in any way that absolutely nothing was trucked out of Iraq?
As time passes there is more evidence that contridicts your "pure and innocent Saddam" concept.
Ah - you are right and I was wrong - what was I thinking? I should know that Swedish inspectors and UN inspectors have the USA as their primary concern to protect. How silly of me to think otherwise!
dude, they found a gigantic wmd and bush just had a press conference about it...come check out my site to see where its at!
Post a Comment