TAKING BACK AMERICA!

    Friday, November 28, 2008

    Equality & Extortion

    Curtis Lavelle Vance is the black man that brutally beat and slaughtered Anne Pressly, a 26 year old white anchorwoman. Mr. Vance is a known criminal and fortunately has been arrested. Don't worry - he won't be punished because he is a victim of a something - I'm sure liberals will come to his defense.

    If this was a white man that beat and slaughtered a young black woman it would quickly be classified as a hate crime.

    However, blacks - especially black males - are exempt from racial hate crime charges so police are just calling it a random attack.

    Uh yeah, right.

    Worried those union puppets in Congress are going to give the UAW auto industry a $23 BILLION extortion payout? You can stop worrying.

    The prime puppets Pelosi, Schumer, Obama, and Reid are planning to pay their puppet masters $75 BILLION instead! The United Auto Workers socialist union have stood firm in not willing to renegotiate (lower) their contracted salaries and exorbitant benefits to help keep their industry afloat.

    Hey - don't blame me. I've been warning of the growing union machine infesting out country and government ever since I started this blog! You voted the puppet creeps into Congress, so you can reap the shame.

    22 comments:

    Anonymous said...

    justadog: "blacks - especially black males - are exempt from hate crime charges"

    reality: According to the FBI, in 2007 about 20% of hate crimes (1448 out of 6965 total) were committed by blacks. Check this report from the FBI for details.

    JustaDog said...

    I'd call an unbalanced 80% prosecution against whites vs. blacks as proof of my claim.

    There are many stats of black murders, rapes, and assaults upon whites that simply get ignored as "hate crimes".

    Violent blacks are well aware of this and will prefer to select more vulnerable and trusting whites to target as their victims knowing the odds are in their favor of never being charged with a hate crime - 1 in 5.

    On the flip side if the criminal is white their odds of being charged with a hate crime is 5 times greater.

    Thanks for proving my point.

    Anonymous said...

    You can call it "proof" of your claim but actually it shows your claim to be false. Maybe you don't know the meaning of the word "exempt" or the word "proof".

    Anonymous said...

    justadog: "I'd call an unbalanced 80% prosecution against whites vs. blacks as proof of my claim."

    It's not as unbalanced as you might think. First, it's 60% white vs 20% black ( the rest not being identified as black or white ). Second, that's not too far from the population distribution of the United States overall so these numbers should not be surprising.

    In any case, your claim was that blacks are "exempt" which is clearly wrong.

    Anonymous said...

    justadog: Pelosi, Schumer, Obama, and Reid are planning to pay their puppet masters $75 BILLION instead!

    I see your "support" for this claim is a letter to the editor in the online Augusta Chronicle from a guy who "just heard" it. Here's a tip for you - don't believe everything you read on the internet. Your readers should keep this in mind too.

    thehim said...

    Vance isn't really a "known criminal" either. He has a DUI and some traffic violations. It's possible he's the guilty party here, but it's also possible they've arrested the wrong guy. You might want to wait until more details come out...

    JustaDog said...

    Simple as this. If you wish to dispute my claim provide a link to a news article where a black man is charged with a racial "hate crime" against a white.

    Waiting.....

    Anonymous said...

    Here's such a link : A 32-year-old black man was charged with a racial hate crime Thursday night after, police said, he threw beer bottles and a piece of brick at a white man while threatening him.

    JustaDog said...

    Well nice try, except it turns out it wasn't a white man but a Hispanic man. Demetrick Sanders was released fron jail and sentenced to probation.

    Like I claim - blacks get a pass. Nice try - my challenge still stands.

    Anonymous said...

    Your original claim, "blacks - especially black males - are exempt from hate crime charges", said nothing about the victim of the hate crime. The previous link does dispute that claim regardless of the ethicity of the victim.

    In any case, here's another one: A homeless black man who stabbed a white woman to death, saying that he wanted to start a race war, was sentenced on Monday to 25 years to life in prison, the maximum imposed on a charge of murder as a hate crime.

    So now you have the FBI report that says 20% of hate crime offenders are black, and two specific stories about hate crimes committed by blacks. Your statement that blacks are exempt from hate crime charges is wrong.

    JustaDog said...

    I guess I need to be more specific so what I post isn't taken literal per-letter.

    Of course there must have been some incidents somewhere, but compared to white vs. black charges whites will be charged at a much greater rate.

    The same is true for homosexuals. After the defeat of Calif. gay marriage measure some violent gays assaulted an elderly straight woman - but they were never charged with a hate crime because gays get a free pass as well.

    BTW - an interesting link you posted goes to prove another point of mine that I didn't post about - that it is mainly liberal blacks that continue to pump racist issues into society.

    Only liberals stand to gain from racial hate, along with other radical groups like Muslims, and pretty much any non-white liberal entities.

    JustaDog said...

    BTW - the evil of the crime of the link you posted is not the "hate crime" aspect, but the fact it was a murder.

    Also, this murderer had already been through the prison system as a sex offender. If the justice system would operate by my standards he, as a sex offender (rape and assault), would have been executed - not released.

    Yet another flaw in the ever-increasing liberal "justice" system. Liberals do not care about the law abiding citizens - they never have and they never will.

    thehim said...

    Of course there must have been some incidents somewhere, but compared to white vs. black charges whites will be charged at a much greater rate.

    Um, no. And he's already posted the link proving you wrong.

    JustaDog said...

    Gee - I must have missed the link you're referring to which you claim proves me wrong.

    So where is your phantom link that proves blacks are charged more (or the same) as whites???

    You will never find the proof because it doesn't exist.

    tuff1 said...

    hey justadog thanks for tellin it like is brotha we see things the same way its weird how others just dont get it why is it that there is a limited few who can see the truth?

    JustaDog said...

    Liberals have entrenched themselves in high places and have perverted the concept of equality and continues to promote fascism.

    Anonymous said...

    You may not have meant your claim literally but you defended it for two days before admitting that it was not true in a "literal per-letter" kind of way ( a lie in other words ). Did you realize that your claim was a lie when you posted it? Or did it take two days of denial and "challenges" for you to catch on?

    JustaDog said...

    Nice try, but no lie was told. I know it's difficult with limited intelligence - there's a difference between simply reading and comprehension.

    For example, the phrase "all men are created equal" - I would guess you think that applies only to men?

    This is my last response to this so you can continue your vain attempts to discredit the truth.

    Anonymous said...

    justadog: there's a difference between simply reading and comprehension.

    And there's a difference between simply writing what you fear might be true and telling the truth.

    Anonymous said...

    Just in case anyone missed it, take note of the bait and switch by justadog:

    justadog original claim: "blacks - especially black males - are exempt from hate crime charges"

    justadog (11/28): If you wish to dispute my claim provide a link to a news article where a black man is charged with a racial "hate crime" against a white.

    response (11/29): A homeless black man who stabbed a white woman to death, saying that he wanted to start a race war, was sentenced on Monday to 25 years to life in prison, the maximum imposed on a charge of murder as a hate crime.

    justadog (11/30): Of course there must have been some incidents somewhere, but compared to white vs. black charges whites will be charged at a much greater rate.

    So first he asks for a link then, when shown such a link, changes his story saying he didn't mean what he said literally.

    My guess is that when he made his original post, he actually thought that what he was saying was true but didn't bother checking. Then when shown evidence proving that he is wrong (which he asked for), he says he meant something else.

    JustaDog said...

    If you read your own story link this scumbag wasn't arrested for committing a "hate crime", nor was he even charged with a "hate crime".

    It wasn't until AFTER they arrested him and based on what he said that the police added a "hate crime" charge.

    This scumbag was a violent person that should have been executed for previous crimes, but your liberal "justice" system keeps putting them out on the streets.

    I give the guy credit for being smart enough to know if he made his crime sound like a "hate crime" it would help keep him in liberal punishment for the rest of his life - free food, free cloths, free dental, free health care, ...

    In contrast if a white person expresses his/her frustrations in a non-violent way (graffiti, show a noose, etc.) the accusations of "HATE CRIME" flood the airwaves, even when there is no victim.

    Everyone saw the racist attacks from liberals, from blacks, against a radio personality for saying "natty hos" (or however it's spelled) but it's ok for black rap "artists" to talk about "white bitches", "killing white hos", etc.

    Black activists (not all blacks by any means) continue to fuel the fire of racism.

    Anonymous said...

    The first two sentences of your previous comment directly contradict each other.

    justadog sentence 1: If you read your own story link this scumbag wasn't arrested for committing a "hate crime", nor was he even charged with a "hate crime".

    justadog sentence 2: It wasn't until AFTER they arrested him and based on what he said that the police added a "hate crime" charge.

    Once the police "added a hate crime charge", he was "charged with a hate crime".

    Perhaps you meant to say that he was not initially charged with a hate crime. That would be correct but also irrelevant. Hate crime charges were brought when it became clear that a hate crime was committed.