More Lawyers In The White House?

Think more sharks in the White House is change? Think more sharks in Congress represents hope for America? Think more sharks really care about you?

Let's look at the professions of the major candidates:

• Senator Barack Obama: Attorney, Politician
• Senator Joseph Biden: Attorney, Politician
  

• Senator John McCain: Navy, Politician
• Gov. Sarah Palin: Journalist, Politician
  

FACTS:

• Democrat Presidential: Obama/Biden = same old shark attorneys in DC
  
  
• Republican Presidential: McCain/Palin = NO ATTORNEYS - real change!
  

American citizens have been screwed long enough by attorneys in Washington DC. These slimeballs know how to manipulate the laws, create laws that favor them and their attorney friends, skirt the laws to their favor, and screw us in the end. The lawyers get rich while we get nowhere.

Lawyers are an elitist group - even the potential First Lady, Michelle Obama, is an elitist lawyer. Remember she wasn't proud of America until there was something in it for her. This is the nature of lawyers.

Remember Barack claiming to care for the black poor with one side of his mouth then with the other side, defending a slum lord? That's what lawyers do. It is what defines him.

The only change I can see is NOT VOTING MORE LAWYERS INTO THE WHITEHOUSE or any other government position.

Let's get back to politicians representing the people, not the lawyers representing special interest groups and their past & future clients.

Those representing America should fit a profile like most of America - and most of America are NOT LAWYERS!

More Liberal scumbag lawyers trying to get/stay into Congress:

• Kay R. Hagan (NC) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• Jeff Merkley (OR) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• Dick Durbin (IL) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• Tom Harkin (IA) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• John Kerry (MA) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• Carl Levin (MI) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• Max Baucus (MONT) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• Jack Reed (RI) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER
• Tim Johnson (SD) - ACLU card carrying LAWYER

---

---

Oregon's Real Jeff Merkley

Ok, so I've seen the commercials from Gordon Smith and his claims against Jeff Merkley, then I've seen the Merkley commercials about Gordon Smith. The Smith ads just spew out facts and figures while the Merkley ads are based on getting an emotional response with phrases like "sides with Bush…" and "sides with big oil…" - you know the hate talk.

So I decided to check for myself on the voting record of Jeff Merkley (JM) to find out if his voting pattern would be one that would be counter-productive to the citizens of Oregon. Here's a little of what I found from the Project Vote Smart site - full of boring facts and short on emotional stuff:

HB = House Bill, SB = Senate Bill

• JM voted to increase the Tobacco Tax - HB 2967
• JM voted to increase Property Taxes - SB 1106
• JM voted to lower the age children are forced into government schools - SB 392
• JM voted against Oregon offshore drilling taking away possible billions of $$$ in revenue for the State of Oregon and keeping the USA from becoming more energy self sufficient - SB 790
• JM voted for government to dictate what food items can and cannot be sold (eaten) at public schools - HB 2650
• JM voted in favor of government intrusion into the mortgage industry - HB 3603
• JM voted in favor to use taxpayer's money to fund private stem cell research - HB 2801
• JM voted in favor of government intrusion into the Payday loan industry - HB 2203
  

How does Jeff Merkley rate with special interest groups?

Abortion: He's totally in favor of killing babies before they are born (so much for his claim about caring for children huh?). He's supported the interests of Planned Parenthood (what a joke) and NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon. Sort of contradictory to his 100% rating with the "Oregon Stand for Children" socialist front.

Taxes and spending: The Taxpayer Association of Oregon gives Jeff Merkley a 0% rating - which means he is a danger to taxpayers - you and me no matter what your political party!

Business (where jobs are): The Oregon National Federation of Independent Businesses gave Jeff Merkley a rating of 22% - pretty darn close to anti-business as you can get - translation: Jeff Merkley is bad for businesses.

"Civil rights": Jeff Merkley gets a 80% rating by the ACLU of Oregon - so we know he's a card-carrying pimp for the ACLU.

Gun rights: Jeff Merkley thinks only criminals should possess guns and the NRA has, over all Merkley's political career, given him an "F". I mean really - just look at the list and see the majority of Democrats that want you and I to be defenseless!

Illegal aliens: Jeff Merkley doesn't believe in such a term and has been given an 80% favorable rating by the Oregonians for Immigration Reform - one of those liberal trick labels that really is a front to allow amnesty and illegals into Oregon and the USA.

Labor: Jeff Merkley is most definitely a union puppet - bought and paid for by the American Federation of Teachers-Oregon, the Oregon AFL-CIO, and the SEIU Public Employees Union. You can count on Jeff Merkley raising your taxes simply by supporting more powerful union presence throughout the government, education, and public services sectors - and you and I will pay for it.

So facts on his political position are: greater taxes, greater government controls, growing government even bigger that it is, and being a puppet for unions and their extortionist interests - Oregonians can not afford Jeff Merkley!

I know, lots of boring facts huh - and who the hell cares about facts these days?

I Was Forced To

Poor disgraced Democrat Dan Rather, now he's telling the world that his sincere apology was faked and CBS forced him to apologize. Poor Democrat Dan Rather - he's sad and wants to die with a reputation that he never really had - so he will sue CBS.

---

What's with all these police tortures making the news? We have police tasering a student after he's down on the ground and surrounded - electrocuted just because he's speaking and they ordered him not to speak. He was tortured with high voltage and he posed no threat - he was surrounded and on the ground and held down by police. I hope this student sues to the max.

NOTE: Democrat Senator Kerry could have stopped the incident easily, but he just stood there like a limp noodle. Think that shows this wimp limp noodle couldn't defuse a global situation, let alone a single incident in a school. That's one way of getting out of having to answer tough questions! Kerry - you're a totally worthless wimp.

---

Then a couple of weeks ago (saw the video this morning) we have seen video of police kicking a woman to the ground and using their taser gun to torture her. I think if I was being shocked and I wasn't doing anything threatening I'd be inclined to fight back. This woman posed no threat to the officer and I hope she sues to the max.

---

Then in Tustin, CA sheriff's whipped out their torture gun and tortured an Autistic 15-year-old. Why? Because he was running in and out of traffic after leaving a social services center. They could have stopped traffic temporarly and just grabbed him, but it's easier to whip out that taser.

---

Then police got tough - against a 56 year old woman - IN A WHEEL CHAIR - by whipping out their taser to not only torture her, but killed her. You mean to tell me police couldn't subdue a wheel chair bound woman? Guess it's more fun to taser. Hope the family of this poor woman sues to the max.

---

From Wikipedia:

The resulting 'shock' is caused by muscles twitching uncontrollably, appearing as muscle spasms. However, because the amount of current is relatively low, there is considered to be a 'margin' of safety by a number of medical experts. Experts generally agree that this margin is highly dependent on the overall health of the person subjected to the shock. Usually, the higher the voltage, the more effective it is. It may take several seconds to subdue a subject with 100,000 Volts, but only about a second with 1 MV (1,000,000 Volts).

---

What Senators made the choice to stand with MoveOn.org: Hypocrisy in Action and thus tell the troops they're all a bunch of losers? Well coward Obama was afraid to vote so he, by default voted with MoveOn and against the troops. The list sounds like top ACLU and socialist pansies:

• Democrat Senator I Da Bitch Clinton
• Democrat Senator I Love Accountants Dodd
• Democrat Senator Pineapple 4a Brain Akaka
• Democrat Senator ACLU Gold Card Bingaman
• Democrat Senator Indian Hater Biden
• Democrat Senator Worthless Boxer
• Democrat Senator Lier Brown
• Democrat Senator Organized Crime Obama
• Democrat Senator KKK Byrd
• Democrat Senator Let Illegals Vote Cantwell
• Democrat Senator Burp'n Durbin
• Democrat Senator Sleazy Feingold
• Democrat Senator Vietnam Lier Harkin
• Democrat Senator Pineapple 4a Brain Inouye
• Democrat Senator Woman Killer Kennedy
• Democrat Senator Wimp Kerry
• Democrat Senator Anti-gun Lautenberg
• Democrat Senator I've got Alzheimer's Levin
• Democrat Senator Ethics violator Menendez
• Democrat Senator They're Not Terrorists Murray
• Democrat Senator Union Love'n Reed
• Democrat Senator I love illegals Reid
• Democrat Senator Still alive Rockefeller
• Democrat Senator Global Warmer Sanders
• Democrat Senator Bigger Gov. Schumer
• Democrat Senator Unstable Stabenow
• Democrat Senator Clinton Appointed Whitehouse
• Democrat Senator Unlimited Abortion Wyden
  

---

Let me get this straight. Bush invades Iraq and kills Saddam because we thought he had WMDs. But then Bush allows Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to come to the USA, use tax payers money to protect him, yet Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has ignored UN directives, really is building nuclear weapons, told Israel they "should be wiped off the map", and responsible for hundreds of US soldiers deaths and deaths of thousands of innocent people. He has also said "Islam is the only religion that can save mankind" (cause he intends to kill everyone else). What's wrong with this "logic"?

I guess Bush just forgot what "religion" was responsible for 9/11 and most all other terrorist attacks, pre and post 9/11.

Mallslims?

Breaking news from one of the Australia's news sites I check:

PHILIPPINE police arrested a suspected Muslim militant plotting to bomb a crowded shopping mall in Manila's southern suburbs, a police general said today.

Will malls be the location of choice for future Muslim attacks? The target profile fits - helpless women, elderly strolling the walkways, and children to kill; people grouped in a centralized location; little security; lots of ways to escape the area.

Malls make great targets for Muslims to carry out their murderous terrorist attacks. Who would suspect a bag left near a food court or children's area that appeared to have packages - or even toy boxes. In a crowded mall there's a good chance no one would even suspect it was bomb.

Organizations the protect Muslims - especially CAIR - don't want people to know the truth about Muslims. Just this past week at a Young America's Foundation meeting CAIR threatened to bring a lawsuit against the organization for inviting Robert Spencer, a commentator that (I guess) doesn't hold back in telling the facts about Muslims. CAIR's claim? Spencer's viewpoint constituted a "Hate Crime" against Muslims.

Many times small groups of Muslims threaten and kill those that dare expose them. A recent example is the Black Muslim Bakery in Oakland California - responsible for ambushing and murdering Oakland Post editor Chauncey Bailey - because he was investigating these Muslims - Muslims that had a storefront of a supposedly innocent bakery.

People need to realize CAIR claims to oppose terrorism yet in reality they are the frontline to attack those that seek to expose it.

Then we have a couple of Muslims - Yousef Megahen and Armed Mohamed - arrested with bomb materials in South Carolina. The mainstream media makes sure the reports have been sanitized for references to "Muslim", and the FBI - in their post-CAIR-sensitivity-trained announcements - states "there is no known link to terrorism" - also nicely sanitized.

Testing The Stupidity Of Americans

Last Friday:

ACLU: US Can't Bar Terrorism Supporters - A civil rights group asked a judge Friday to find it unconstitutional for the federal government to exclude a prominent Muslim scholar or anyone else from the United States on the grounds that they may have endorsed or espoused terrorism.

Is anyone stupid enough to believe the "American" Civil Liberties Union cares about America?

Hundreds of innocent people are routinely murdered each month by Muslims - the very same terrorists that the ACLU demands the Federal government allow into our country.

From Iraq to India, from Thailand to Bangladesh, from the Philippines to Somalia - all over the world thousands are summarily executed and murdered by Muslims - and the ACLU demands the most outspoken in favor of such murder be allowed inside our boarders.

Take that fact along with the fact that most every liberal Democrat wants the offensive against these terrorists to stop - basically a "leave them alone" policy.

Take that fact along with the fact that most every liberal is a card-carrying ACLU member.

Take that fact along with the fact the Democrat platform is practically identical to most any socialist web site's Manifesto.

Take that fact along with the fact that most every Democrat politician supports the socialist union labor structure (and the socialist union labor structure supports the Democrats).

Take that fact along with the fact that most every Democrat politician favors the USA adopting international law and dumping the Constitution of the United States -

Take all of that and more and perhaps you will begin to get a glimpse of what is in store for our country.