Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts

    Monday, December 01, 2008

    The Hideous Link Of Liberals & AIDS

    The accumulated and continued toll of HIV/AIDS is directly attributed to the hate that liberals (aka, Progressives) have and are spewing upon society.

    First, HIV and the resulting AIDS it advances is primarily spread by unprotected sexual contact, largely via homosexual (abnormal) exchange of body fluids. The most common transfer is via anal sex - a predominate favorite with homosexuals and blacks (sorry - CDC stats show HIV highest in blacks - not a racist statement).

    If society would have had compassion upon the normal healthy members the spread of HIV would have been stopped fast:
    • Identification - Instead of massive testing to identify who is carrying this deadly virus, Liberals protected the infected by making claims of profiling or stereotyping and thus protected the infected individuals and allowing them to spread the virus
    • Containment - Instead of quick quarantines of the infected, Liberals used the courts to maintain the freedom of movement throughout society and thus protected the infected individuals and allowing them to spread the virus
    • Compassion - Instead of showing compassion on the predominately normal sectors of society and a willing desire to protect the health and well-being of the healthy, Liberals focused "compassion" toward the infected as well as the segments of society most likely to become infected (homosexuals), and thus protected the infected individuals and allowing them to spread the virus
    • Forced Burden - Instead of containing and removing the threat, Liberals force entire governments to spend TRILLIONS of $$$ by shifting the hard-earned wages of normal healthy workers into worthless sinkholes that simply delay the ultimate fate of the infected, and thus protected the infected individuals and allowing them to spread the virus
    • Protection - Instead of banning those infected from mingling with the healthy, Liberals have forced the USA to recognize the HIV/AIDS infected as having a 'handicap', and thus protected the infected individuals and allowing them to spread the virus
    Can you imagine if Liberals controlled society as they do now back when the Black Plague (Yersinia Pestis, aka, Bubonic Plague) raged in the early 1400's? The estimated 100+ million that were killed could very well have killed every human on Earth - given the same compassion BS they forced as they do with HIV/AIDS.

    Liberals have a twisted concept of compassion. Think of the millions that would have been saved if society acted promptly - with a brain, with higher intelligence - instead of with the ignorance of Liberalism.

    Liberal President-elect Barack Obama is moving swiftly to appoint homosexual activists to positions within his administration. Story here.

    As Liberals force recognition of homosexuality as 'normal' then their abnormal and immoral special interest group will enjoy even more special protections and recognition than they already do.


    Thursday, September 11, 2008

    9/11 Secrets You're Not Suppose To Know

    There's plenty of info on the 9/11 attacks but what about before this Muslim attack? Were there warnings? Did our intelligence have any hints? Was there any incident that might have caused this attack?

    The attacks happened just months after Republican President Bush started his first term in office - yet the attacks took years to plan. Even before he was sworn into office the Muslim players were finalizing their details of their deadly suicidal plot.

    In the prior Democrat administration under President Clinton, knowledge of Bin Laden and his ties to terrorism were well known - at least well known to many but not fully accepted by President Clinton. Democrat President Clinton didn't want to use phrases like Islamic Terrorists because he didn't want to offend Muslims.

    Democrat President Clinton was in office from 1993 - 2001. Islamic terrorist attacks didn't start in 1993, but President Clinton was just in office a matter of days when a Muslim Pakistani attacked the CIA building in Langley, VA killing two agents and wounding others. An Islamic attack on American soil. Clinton's actions: Nothing.

    Using planes as weapons was nothing new. In 1994 Muslims hijacked (at Algiers) Air France Flight 8969 to crash it into Paris but their attempts failed.

    In May of 1996 Muslim Osama bin Laden unites the Islamic Fundamentalists worldwide in their Jihad against Jews and Western Gentiles, such as al-Qaeda, Palestinian Authority, Hezbollah, Hamas, Mujahideen, using the Taliban's organization to help fund the operations. Clinton's actions: Nothing.

    There were many Islamic terrorists' attacks during Clinton's administration, and there were many journalists that sat down with Bin Laden for interviews. During President Clinton's administration Muslim Osama Bin Laden was easy to access - but despite this easy access Democrat President Clinton never tried to take him into custody and he didn't want to offend Muslims. Clinton's actions: Nothing.

    Muslims bombed the US Embassy in Peru in Jan. 1998. - President Clinton now in office for 5 years. One month after that bombing (Feb) a published statement signed by many Islamic Jihad Leaders from most Muslim countries - first by Sheikh Osama Bin Ladin:
    "…In compliance with God's order, we issue the following fatwa to all Muslims:

    The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies-civilians and military-is an individual duty for every Muslim who can, in any country in which it is possible… We - with Allah's help - call on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded, to comply with Allah's order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it. Unless you go forth, Allah will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."
    Later that year (Aug) simultaneous bombings of US Embassies took place in Kenya and Tanzania - killing 224 and injuring 5,000. Later that same month in 1998 President Clinton was told he needed to do something - anything - because he was looking like an incompetent worthless noodle. Clinton ordered a load of cruise missiles into Afghanistan and Sudan - code named Operation Infinite Reach, wiping out an innocent pharmaceutical factory (officials later admitting the evidence was not as solid as first thought). This would become a key point in the eventual 9/11 attack.

    Earth was cleaned of a number of Islamic terrorists training camps - that was good. However, many in the intelligence community believe it was this attack that stirred the Muslim hive that led to the attack on New York and Washington DC.

    Following the Aug. 20 attacks Taliban spokesman Wakil Ahmed told US DoS officials:
    "If Kandahar could have retaliated with similar strikes against Washington, it would have."
    Unfeasible at that time but realized just 3 years later.

    It wasn't until after the two US Embassy bombings in 1998 that President Clinton finally ordered Bin Laden to be extradite but Saudi Arabia and Pakistan were unwilling to help. President Clinton's error was thinking a mass terrorist leader could be simply brought to the USA using some legal process. All the times President Clinton had easy access to Bin Laden - never did he try and grab him. All of the intel warnings that President Clinton was briefed on by the CIA - ignored - until it was too little - too late.

    One of the last Islamic attacks upon America under the Clinton administration was in Oct. 2000 when a suicide boat exploded a 40 foot hold into the USS Cole killing 17 American soldiers and injuring 39 others. Clinton's retaliation? Nothing.

    Now we have another Democrat that thinks Islamic Extremists is a naughty phrase and shouldn't be uttered. This candidate is not only as bad as Clinton when it comes to protecting the USA - he wants to sit down and have a pow-wow with the most evil of them all.

    The only reason you have a pow-wow:
    • You are willing to concede to each others demands
    • You are willing to negotiate away something
    • You are willing to surrender something in order to obtain some objective
    I don't know about you but this Dog aint ever going to surrender.

    Thursday, August 28, 2008

    Same Old Bill

    On January 26, 1998 Bill Clinton, with sincerity and firmness of conviction, uttered his famous truth:
    I did not have sexual relations with that woman
    CNN had their expression expert to "read" Bill's gestures, his lips, and all other visible signs whether he was telling the truth. CNN's expert confirmed Bill was being sincere and truthful - and Mrs. Hillary Clinton's accusation that this was all a right-wing conspiracy was given credibility.

    Obviously, it was Democrat Bill Clinton that was lying to the American people - to save from an embarrassing encounter.

    On August 27, 2008 - just over 10 years later, Bill Clinton, with sincerity and firmness of conviction, uttered his famous truth:
    Everything I learned in my eight years as president and in the work I've done since, in America and across the globe, has convinced me that Barack Obama is the man for this job
    CNN had their expression expert to "read" Bill's gestures, his lips, and all other visible signs whether he was telling the truth. CNN's expert confirmed Bill was being sincere and truthful, thus giving Bill Clinton credibility.

    10 years ago Bill Clinton sold out his wife for sex.

    Obviously Bill Clinton sold out America, his wife, and the 18+ MILLION voters that voted for his wife - for a buck. The millions in debt accumulated by his wife - her outstanding campaign loans are $12.4 MILLION - and won't be wiped clean until Senator Obama wins in November. That is their arraignment.

    And all those 18+ Million that voted for Hillary, and Hillary herself - duped again - by the best liar in the business.

    Thursday, August 21, 2008

    Crude Crisis & Progressive Glue

    One of the various fabricated crisis in America is the so-called oil crisis, aka, energy crisis. Almost a year ago I posted on the election JIVE that recent presidents Nixon, Carter, Bush, and Clinton delivered to the masses targeting energy independence. Barack Obama's plan of no-plan falls into this same JIVE (like fabricating 5 million new windmill jobs).

    Q: Does America have an oil crisis?
    A: Yes - a very serious problem.

    Q: Did this crisis just happen as the result of natural causes or was it fabricated (caused) by someone or some group?
    A: It was and still is caused by the Progressive mindset - mostly Democrats - in both the Federal and State governments.

    Q: How could Progressives (aka Liberals, aka Socialists) cause an oil crisis?
    A: Using the power of the government they stripped the free market and free enterprise capabilities of all American oil companies - the entire American oil industry - and micro-managed where they could get their oil from and how much they could extract domestically.

    Q: Wouldn't this harm America's interests?
    A: Of course - but part of their agenda is to bring America to its knees and no longer be the most powerful nation in the world. Their agenda includes forcing America to be dependent on others and not be able to be self-sustaining.

    Q: Can their objective actually take place?
    A: It already has been and still is.

    Q: Which presidential candidate supports this Progressive scheme against America and Americans?
    A: Senator Barack Obama.

    Q: Do they try and trick and deceive Americans?
    A: Yes, by trying to convince Americans the oil industry is really your enemy. Expect these deceivers to use their Democrat Convention to divert attention from their government fist up the oil industry's ass by parading some poor smucks around that are needy (probably by their own poor choices in life) and flashing the income from oil companies. This is their biggest trick and many uneducated people fall for it.

    Q: Can they be stopped?
    A: Simple - vote existing Progressives out of office and don't vote any more in (then watch the gas per-gallon price plummet).



    Progressives and unions stick together like glue. The union bosses give the ok to channel money into a Democrat candidate's campaign in exchange for favors back to the union. Here is a recent real life example of how this works - from Ohio:

    Two Franklin County Commissioners, Mary Jo Kilroy and Marilyn Brown, - both Pro-Obama supporters - both Progressives, and thus both puppets of the union. So the stage is set - Pro-Obama, Pro-Union, Pro-gressives in a position of deciding how to spend tax payers money.

    Follow the summary of events:

    A - The county had planned a new ballpark and construction was required
    B - A bid process was performed and an in-state company, TP Mechanical Contractors, had the lowest bid
    C - The two Pro-Obama Commissioners found out TP Mechanical Contractors was not a union company and came up with some BS to disqualify TP Mechanical Contractors
    D - The two Pro-Obama Commissioners selected an out-of-state UNION contractor, Tomko, even though using the unionized company cost the tax payers $215,000 more - almost a quarter of a million more, in addition to keeping the tax payer's money within their own state
    Tomko, the winner, previously had been fined $23,000 by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration for four serious safety violations related to an accident that killed a worker in 2006. . . .

    withheld a worker's pension while he served in Iraq and was taken to court - forcing Tomko to pay over $48K to the worker . . .

    Tomoko's president got jailed for tax evasion in 2004 - usual union stuff

    E - Tomoko, the union company, are being blamed for a construction foul-up that undermined a section of the new county ballpark and caused damages of at least $150,000

    Better get use to this type of business deals with your Progressive/Liberal/Democrat politicians - it is what defines them - it is the Obama way - that Change for America.
    McCain accumulated some homes through decades of achievement - so what. Obama got his million $$$ home with the help of his gangster friend Tony Rezko.


    Monday, August 18, 2008

    The Morphing Of China <=> United States

    China is still a Communist State, yet the economic condition of China continues to improve. China is now the third largest nation in trade with the fourth largest economy in the world. A new study by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Albert Keidel, a former US treasury official, predicts that, by 2035, China will be the world's largest economy and, by 2050, will grow to twice the size of the US economy.

    There are zillions of factors that affect a nation's economy, but comparing the USA and China can be summed with one major change. China is becoming what the USA use to be and the USA is becoming more like the earlier days of China's collectivism - socialism.

    China's change: after about 30 years of economic liberalization - lessening government controls, allowing private ownership, lessening government interference - the natural synergism of free enterprise has been ignited.

    USA's change: after about 30 years of increasing government controls, increased government interference, increased government oversight, increased government bailouts - government control of which business would survive or fall, calls for certain industries to be nationalized, manipulation by government of the monetary system, and all the other increases of fascist-type controls - the natural synergism of free enterprise is being snuffed out.

    Some of the major turning points were the socialist unions grip almost 30 years ago on the big steel industry of America - eventually putting the industry into a horrible competitive disadvantage. Greedy socialist union leaders (of which Senator Obama has pledged and promised his presidency to) pushed the steel industry practically into extinction in the USA - 500,000 jobs lost and an industry as well.

    Same with the textile and other industries - and now the auto industry. The UAW wage demands adds at least $2,000 to the cost of a vehicle over the same class from Toyota.

    Want the totally truthful equation?

    Unions = socialism = Barack Obama = BIG GOVERNMENT = fascism.


    Friday, August 08, 2008

    Are You Afraid To Ask?


    It's a simple YES or NO question. Do it for each candidate - or are you afraid?


    In my daily union email I get this from the AFL/CIO:
    Last week brought us news of Wal-Mart pressuring employees to vote against Democrats like Jeff Merkley who are fighting for working families. Now we're learning that corporate front groups are taking it a step further and unleashing vicious, misleading attacks on Merkley.
    Oh - that's odd - the only pressure I know in the workplace is from union bosses ordering their members how to vote. Their mailings include all sorts of lies and misrepresentations to convince their little union clogs to vote the Union Way. The most important goal of this election is to tip the balance even farther in the (already failed) currently Democratic Controlled Congress to this legislation passes. That is why unions are pouring over $100 MILLION into the coffers of their political puppets - it is crucial to their survival.

    One of the hot tactics unions are trying to get their political puppets (politicians, mostly Democrat) to pass is deceptively called Employee Free Choice Act. Union bosses claim it will "restore workers' freedom to form unions and bargain without employer harassment".

    Workers already have the freedom to vote for a union or not - there is nothing to restore. That this legislation does, if passed in your state - or worse - the federal government as Senator Obama wants - would take away workers freedom to vote without fear.

    If passed - the Employee Free Choice Act JIVE would force a worker's vote to be known to fellow workers and union bosses, thus opening that worker up for harassment - or something worse.

    In this hot political arena this is one test to determine if your candidate of choice is a union puppet - bought and paid for by unions (and thus beholding to them) or if your candidate represents his constituents. Just ask your candidate this 1 simple question:

    Do you support the right of a vote to remain private?

    Jeff Merkley of Oregon does not support the most fundamental of an individual's freedom.

    Jeff Merkley is just another union puppet - just ask him the question.

    It's a simple YES or NO question. Do it for each candidate - or are you afraid?

    Thursday, July 24, 2008

    Have A Warm Fuzzy Weekend

    Instead of focusing on all of the negative crap in our country I thought I'd post some recent news items that will sure to leave you feeling warm and fuzzy all over. This is all real - all factual - and I've provided links for you to check for yourself.



    Got too much money? Democrat Barbara Boxer and her other Democrat cohorts want to help you spend your money. Their plan is to "make a substantial investment in international family planning programs in the Fiscal Year 2009". Read her letter to see how Democrats want to increase funding to $1 BILLION each year for "international family planning". Screw Americans - Democrats want to spread your bucks around. No wonder Democrat Obama - aka Mr. Sugar Daddy - is drawing big crowds in other countries.

    I mean really, we all have too much money sitting around and it's really not a big problem to pay higher taxes for the good of the UN - is it? I'm so fuzzy warm knowing Democrats will always think of ways to spend my surplus! Since Democrats took control of Congress their spending spree is approaching $10 TRILLION - in DEBT - money you and your children will have to pay.



    Well thank God for Desmond TuTu. The Tutu, in a video message for the UK-based World Development Movement (WDM), has backed calls for the British government and British citizens to take "tough action" on climate change.

    The Anglican Archbishop of past Desmond Toot Toot has declared that businessmen that take airplane flights instead of using video conferencing are sentencing the poor people of the world to DEATH! I wonder if this includes Al Gore and all his jet trips? Good ole Toot Toot, he doesn't hold back on showing his intellect and Nobel wisdom and that's worth a few fuzzy goosebumps!

    I think it's great that TooToo has expanded his expertise into Earth Climatology - why not! Every other socialist has jumped on the bandwagon! I just feel so secure in the future of icebergs knowing Toot Toot is on top of this crisis (not)!



    If you live in Europe you can now by "ethical" car insurance - yep - carbon neutral car insurance. Damn - why didn't I think of that! Promising people they can save money on insurance for their gas-guzzler and at the same time "save the planet". In the text of the advertisement they say "You'll also get that warm fuzzy feeling you get inside from knowing you're doing your bit to help fight climate change.".

    Yep - it's comforting to know that America is not the only place STUPID people live! Gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling just thinking of all the money IBuyEco is making! Ah, those crafty Europeans.



    Oakland Airport - in the land of Democrats - will buy 26 natural gas combustion buses as shuttles. Here we have a pile of Democrats that have been ranting about global warming and what do they do? They go out and buy combustion engine buses. Can't these fools just sit down with the Walt Disney engineers and find out how Disney has been using electric vehicles to shuttle patrons around for decades?

    But I guess natural gas is suppose to be "better" than stinky diesel so let's get that good fuzzy feeling about the smaller carbon footprint of their combustion choice.



    Friday, June 20, 2008

    A Growing Population Of Masochists

    Mas·och·ism:
    Gratification gained from pain, deprivation, degradation, etc., inflicted or imposed on oneself, either as a result of one's own actions or the actions of others, esp. the tendency to seek this form of gratification.
    Gas continues to go higher as Democrats continue to punish those that can least afford higher prices. It's as if Democrats want to create a "gas crisis" in order to justify their real objectives - of a government-controlled petroleum industry. Government already has a death grip around oil companies with huge taxes, forcing the American companies to buy imported oil, and dictating to companies where they can and cannot harvest oil. Democrats force middle and lower income families to endure growing financial nightmares yet the masochist voter continues to vote Democrats into controlling positions.

    Then you have some states that have forced non-oil "bio-fuels" into people's vehicles. These additives come mostly from grain, which means less grain for feeding livestock and for feeding humans. Result of the Democrat's goulash controls and mandates are even more financial burdens for the middle and lower income families to endure at the grocery store, yet the masochist voter continues to vote Democrats into controlling positions.

    Then you have cities and states that are realizing lower gas tax revenues because people are filling up less, so you have some Democrat cities and states wanting to come up with even more gas taxes and various fees to keep their governmental glut social programs and illegal alien programs alive. So who pays these additional taxes and fees? You and I do. Democrats continue to force financial nightmares upon the middle and lower class yet the masochist voter continues to vote Democrats into controlling positions.

    Then you have Democrats - the liars and deceivers that they are - pretending to care about workers rights, yet they vote against the right of a worker to have a secret ballot when it comes to voting whether or not a workplace should be unionized. No surprise there - Democrats are well known as the puppets of the unions.

    Then you have slime like Democrat Senator Christopher Dodd (chairman of the Banking Committee), Democrat Senator Kent Conrad (chairman of the Budget Committee and member of the Finance Committee) along with a couple of former Democrat Cabinet members - all having received preferential treatment from Countrywide Financial. Democrat Dodd received $15,000 from Countrywide for his 2008 campaign. Democrat slime profited while middle and lower income families have to deal with growing financial nightmares, yet the masochist voter continues to vote Democrats into controlling positions.

    Wednesday, June 18, 2008

    Their Dirty Little Secret

    The official call from President Bush for the Democrat-controlled Congress to release their big government embargo against being energy self-sufficient was made today. The mindset of Democrats is simple and took place in two steps. The first was to block oil harvesting because of environmental concerns. The second - and current mindset - is to force American to be reliant on other countries.

    The concept of self-reliance and responsible for one's self is contrary to Liberals (there are many conservative Democrats that don't follow the Liberal Democrat's philosophy). What better way to force Americans to be part of the "global community" that to force us to depend on other nations - primarily the biggest enemy of the USA - Saudi Arabia. If America was self-reliant then the (forced) need for America's dependency would be diminished.

    So here are various scenarios of how this will play out:
    1. Congress lifts their big government blockade - oil futures drop - OPEC reduces prices - Congress says "prices are now lower so we'll put back the blockade".

    2. Congress says they will work on possibly lifting the blockade but will stall in hopes of Senator Obama election to the Presidency, thus forcing Americans to be even more dependent on the Saudis and globalism.

    3. Congress forced by the American people to remove their blockade. Congress forced by the American people to NOT add fees to the gas prices, American's can be assured of future oil independence along with future alternative energy research and development in parallel.


    Wednesday, May 21, 2008

    Pursuit Of Happiness Declared Illegal

    No, this is not a joke. In the Preamble of the United States Declaration of Independence American's are guaranteed certain unalienable RIGHTS:
    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
    This is in conflict with the United Nation's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3:
    Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
    Missing: The pursuit of happiness.

    The UN enjoys practically total support from Democrats, and "Progressives" have stolen the Democrat party and for years now, embrace the replacement of US law for UN law.

    From pouring American's hard earned tax money to pet nations and global (BS) causes this party has NO intent of protecting America, nor protecting the American economy, nor protecting the pursuit of happiness our founding fathers promised.

    As Government gets bigger and Democrats move American citizens into this growing fascist state expect pursuit of happiness to be replaced with the pursuit of survival.

    Fascism will continue to erode everything from freedom of speech to your right to make a buck. Once you make a buck give it to the fascist Democrats. Their fascist empire will tell you what you can say, who can say what, who can go to this school or not, etc.

    Pursuit of happiness - not in the Democrat's playbook.

    Monday, May 19, 2008

    Pissed At Pump Prices?

    The AP article of 1 hour ago reads Pump prices rise to new high as oil stalls:
    Americans are now paying an average of $3.79 for a gallon of regular gas, according to a survey by AAA and the Oil Price Information Service. Diesel, used to transport a wide range of goods, now costs $4.52 a gallon.
    With oil (short) futures over $126 / barrel I find out about one of many huge oil deposits on American turf located in Colorado's Denver-Julesburg basin. A small private oil company recently drilled here, found good supply of medium-grade crude, but was forced to shut down their well because of a lack of a pipeline to get the crude to the market. "We can sell for $30/barrel". The local Democrat-controlled government has no interest in helping to supply a pipeline.

    Then there are the huge oil shale deposits in Colorado - on the order of 1.5 TRILLION BARRELS! Shell oil wants to extract this source but it also lays in federal lands, and in December of 2007 the Democrat-controlled Congress took steps to make sure Americans would pay high prices forever. Yep - the Democrat-controlled Congress passed a measure that prohibits spending to establish any program to lease oil shale deposits on federal land. In other words, the Democrats kept money from leases flowing into the general fund and they made sure oil imports continue.

    Then there's the well-known offshore oilfields - also huge - but 85% of the U.S. coastline is off limits to drilling by Democrat congressional decree.

    If you believe in an oil crisis then get the facts and realize any crisis is the result of BIG GOVERNMENT manipulation and regulations - and it is from (mostly) the Democrats.

    Think BIG GOVERNMENT is bad? You ain't seen noth'n yet!




    The past few days I had to attend to some private business - 6 flight segments, 2 coach and 4 first class (the longer segments of 2 - 4+ hours). One takes me through LAX (Los Angeles International) and it was as if I landed in some sleazy city in Mexico. Spanish signs all around, announcements in English and Spanish, the floors splattered with trash, people throwing their cups and papers and used food items under chairs, the restroom gross, fat-thigh pregnant Hispanic girls shoving hamburgers into an already filled fat mouth with 6+ of their bambinos rolling around on the trashy floor - obviously all signs of HI (Hispanic Infestation) and the failure of America to retain control.

    What's sort of ironic is all of this crap was in the American Airlines terminal!!!

    I was glad my next segment was less than an hour away from boarding. All other airports were clean, English only, sanitized bathrooms, etc.

    Wednesday, May 14, 2008

    $8+ / Gallon Oil Within 18 Months

    I'm expecting the pump price for oil to be at least $8 or even more per gallon within the next 18 months - providing more Democrats get into Congress. Who gets elected President won't matter much since all three are liberals and the Office of the President does not control any budgetary or legislative issues.

    Since Democrats have had control of the majority of Congress the pump price has risen over 33%. It would be more but enough Republicans have stopped their insanity - at least for now.

    I find it almost funny how ignorant people think oil companies are the enemy. Let's see - they are the ones that buy the oil and they are the ones that refine the crude and they are the ones that distribute the gas you crave for your SUVs, your gas lawn mowers, your gas powered blowers, your boats, and all those other gas-thirsty devices.

    The same ignorant people are all revved up ready to vote for Democrats that claim "I will take on the big oil companies". The same ignorant people think the profits of oil companies are sitting in some bloated corporate bank account somewhere - too funny. If only these ignorant fools would take a few business courses - learn about corporate structure and who really owns the oil companies. The stock holders, which include investment firms that probably are building your retirement account - just to name one.

    I'm hoping gas soars once the ignorant elect more Democrats into Congress, and I have all the confidence in the world Democrats will make it happen. It seems like the only way for ignorant people to learn the reality of the Progressive's policies is in their own pocketbook. Progressives will try and divert attention to the damage they are doing to the economy with worthless lies - my fav being how Dick Cheney is controlling the oil companies, etc. Too funny.

    Congress makes laws. Congress passes the budget. Congress can investigate. Congress adds burdens upon business. Congress drives companies overseas. Congress is screwing America's economy over royally - and the ignorant idiots want this to continue. Ah, but that is why they are ignorant.

    Enjoy your $8+ gallon gas!

    Wednesday, April 30, 2008

    Are You Better Off Now Than 1.5 Years Ago?

    So how about it - are you better off since Democrats took control of Congress? It was a Democrat Congress that extended America's debt ceiling to well over a TRILLION DOLLARS! On top of that a bill (S.2433) sponsored by Democrat Barack Obama - wanna-be president - will force American taxpayers into deeper debt - on the order of $845 BILLION - his Global Poverty Act will help push America into poverty!

    Are you better off now than you were before the Democrats took control of Congress?

    Ask yourself that question especially when you get gas - now over $1.15 higher - almost $4 / gallon - since Democrats took control - and it will get worse as long as they remain in control, and Democrats like John Dingell (MI) wants to add 50 cents more PER GALLON as an incentive to fill up less and reduce pollution.

    Ask yourself that question if you're unemployed - since Democrats took control the ranks of the unemployed are growing - up over 10% since Democrats took control. Democrats are increasingly making the USA a bad place for a company to do business with increasing interference into the business policies, forced mandates, forcing pro-union laws, forcing wage increases, and basically forcing American business out of the country, forcing them to lay off workers to remain profitable, or into bankruptcy. The latest? Four airlines bankrupt and GM to lay off 3,550.

    Ask yourself that question if you've seen your home equity decline - before the Democrats took control Americans enjoyed historic highs in their home equity, now at the lowest point in over 60 years.

    Ask yourself that question if you are one of the growing home owners facing foreclosure - now more than doubled from the beginning of the Democrat take over of Congress.

    Ask yourself that question if you live in a Democrat controlled city / state and they tell you they have to cut jobs in law enforcement, release prisoners, cut vital services - yet they don't cut their handout programs to the illegal aliens. Want to blame the billions going to the Iraq war? Across the country:

    • $11-$22 BILLION spent on welfare to illegal aliens
    • $2.2 BILLION spent on programs like food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens
    • $2.5 BILLION spent each year on Medicaid for illegal aliens
    • $12 BILLION spent on English programs for illegal alien students
    • $900+ MILLION to incarcerate illegal alien criminals (30% of all Fed. inmates are illegals)
    • $200+ BILLION each year in suppressed American wages caused by illegals
    • and so much more waste that can be avoided - check the link!
    Are you better off now than you were before the Democrats took control of Congress?


    Monday, April 28, 2008

    Bad News For Progressives

    With Progressives scavenging for voters anywhere they can (illegals, dead people, felons, etc.) and promoting "same-day" (and even online) registration of unverified individuals the US Supreme Court has ruled today that states CAN require voters to product photo identification without violating the voter's constitutional rights.

    Gee - how novel - making sure a vote comes from a legal voter and voting just 1 time!

    Many Democratic liberals, along with their fringe "civil rights" groups, hate this concept for obvious reasons. Attempts to derail voter-vote validation by claiming minority voters would be deterred from voting failed. Gee - think their argument was just a lie anyway? Uh - yeah.

    The real test is whether states with Progressive politicians will make use of photo ID or not. I feel sorry for the citizens of a state over-run with Progressive politicians; it's always the legal citizens that suffer and pay the consequences for the actions of a handful of these scummy Progressives.

    Wednesday, April 02, 2008

    Happy Meals To Become Queer Meals


    I would have posted this yesterday but this is no joke. You can thank your Progressive Democrat neighbor and politician for "progressing" the moral culture of America.

    McDonald's will phase out their once popular Happy Meals in favor of their Queer Meals for children. Jim Skinner says the children won't really notice much taste difference since all of the changes will be subliminal.
    We will no longer support mixing a top bun with a bottom bun. Our new focus sandwiches will include two new choices - Dikeburgs will come with two top buns while Gayurgers will come with two butt-ends of the bun.
    In exchange for recognition as a major promoter of the homosexual agenda McDonald's has given, and will continue to give, the National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce millions of dollars. Democrat Richard Ellis, VP of communications at McDonanld's USA and new NGLCC Board of Director member said:
    I'm thrilled to join the National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (NGLCC) team and ready to get to work. I share the NGLCC's HOT PASSION for business growth and development within the LGBT community, and I look forward to playing a role in moving these important initiatives forward.
    A letter from the McDonald Corporation to World Net Daily:
    "McDonald's is indeed a Corporate Partner and Organizational Ally of NGLCC. Our vice president of U.S. communications, Richard Ellis, was recently elected to its board of directors," said Heidi M. Barker, senior director of media relations for McDonald's. NGLCC describes itself as promoting the LGBT community first and always, including same sex marriage.

    NGLCC gives credit to sponsors such as McDonald's for its financial and other support that helps in its work. "Through the commitment of our corporate partners, the NGLCC has been able to advance the ideas and causes of the LGBT business community," the Chamber said.

    Wednesday, March 26, 2008

    Ford Motor Co - Another Union Story

    Today's news of the final sale of Ford's Jaguar and Land Rover brands is another nail in the coffin for the once auto giant. The price Tata Motors (India) paid is $2.3 billion - cash. Ford desperately needs money to pay their enormous union demands for labor-related costs. Over the past two years Ford amassed more than $15 billion in net losses - so their sale doesn't even cover 1/7th of these recent losses. Ah, how the unions really care about jobs - and soon there won't be any at Ford.

    There was a time when a share of Ford Motor Company sold for over $40. As I type this their stock is just $5.86 with a 52-week low of $4.95. As Gordon Gekko of the Wall Street movie fame would call it - a dog with fleas.

    Ford use to be associated with American quality, but that quality continued a downward tread as unions strangled the creative life force from the company and cheaper, low quality parts substituted for the sake of helping to pay spiraling union demands.

    Land Rover use to be a brand of high quality recognition - until Ford bought it from the Brits. In 2006 JD Powers said:
    they are the most problematic cars to own, period. Boasting a most embarrassing 204 problems per hundred, the last truly go-anywhere brand has faltered
    It probably didn't help Ford to align itself with the homosexual special interest groups when they started to advertise in gay magazines and promoting homosexual polygamy as sexual freedom. This prompted a boycott of Ford by family-oriented groups against Ford.

    My first car was a Ford Fairlane. I painted the grill black. At that time (post 70's) it was a hot car with great pickup, but those days are long gone. I have not owned, nor would I ever own, another Ford - ever. Junk incarnate and to me an American manufacturer that manufactures junk is no longer American, but more like some junk brand from China.

    Unions love Democrat candidates, and Democrat candidates will pass any and all legislation that helps empower the corrupt union machine - a machine that continues to destroy American industry.

    Monday, March 03, 2008

    I WON $18 MILLION IN THE LOTTERY!!!

    OMG - I'm sure glad I played the lottery this weekend. Now I'm waiting for my CPA to get to his office because I have no idea what to do. How much tax will I need to pay? Better yet - what's the best way to avoid paying too much tax?

    I opted for the lump sum and I'm looking to shelter as much as I can. I want parts invested so it can generate money just sitting there. Also, I have always wanted to open a private school for citizens only - passports required, with a curriculum focused on math and sciences. I'll have to hire someone to help me make a plan for that in case I go through with it.

    Ah - the easy life - now that I won a virtual lotto! vir·tu·al:
    Existing in the mind, especially as a product of the imagination.
    In the same manner, the USA has virtual security - it's all an illusion. As not to offend Mexico and illegal aliens from south of the border, all three prominent presidential candidates are more than happy with this faux fence - as is Mexico and any threat that has or will come into the USA.

    15-25 million illegal aliens in the USA represents allot of voting influence, especially for Democrats since they are the party that pushes for voting day registration, a practice for the sole purpose of getting illegal votes for their candidates.



    More virtual security comes from the FBI - stating there was and is no terrorist threat in the Las Vegas ricin incident. Connected with anarchists (they seek destruction of governments) the FBI proclaimed, even after taking away several vials of ricin, there is no connection to terrorism.

    Anarchists would have no problem linking up with Muslims since both have the objective to destroy America as it is.

    Enjoy your virtual security while I enjoy the proceeds from winning the virtual lottery.

    Tuesday, February 05, 2008

    How People Vote

    1: Analytical Voting
    A voter will consider the position of the candidate and how their philosophy will impact the short and long term consequences of the country. This voter is not swayed by superficial appearances and takes the facts of the candidate's past record and professional (non-celebrity) endorsements.

    --1a: Believing government should be first - The voter, after analysis, will choose a candidate that will bring bigger government and more government control to the country. They do not believe in individual achievement or the freedom of spirit, but knowingly chooses oppressive control by government and unions. Mr. Obama (endorsed by Mr. Union - T. Kennedy) or Mrs. Clinton, a self-proclaimed socialist, would be your ideal choices.

    --1b: Believing people should be first - The voter, after analysis, will choose a candidate that will bring smaller and less oppressive government to the country. Individual choice and freedom are the priorities and belief in individual responsibility and individual achievement are the goals. Representative Dr. Ron Paul is your best choice, followed by former Governor Romney.

    2: Fuzzy Voting
    These voters choose their candidate based on who best gives them a cozy fuzzy feeling. This choice is totally superficial and based on attributes such as looks, age, race, sex, or which celebrity happens to endorse them. Totally ignorant of policy results that would impact the country this voter is a sucker for words and appearance.

    3: Total Retard Voting
    These groups of voters are unable to think on their own. They vote however their union tells them to vote, or how their party of choice tells them to vote. This group also encompasses illegal aliens that register to vote just to vote for a candidate that will give them amnesty, totally ignorant of policies that impact the country. Most of these voters are low income - probably because they are so stupid. 100% of this group is incapable or unwilling to achieve anything on their own and want a candidate that will promise them all sorts of government handouts.

    Which are you?

    Monday, October 22, 2007

    The Divided Dumb




    I didn't waste my time with the GOP "debate", but I did check out some summaries. To me most of these candidates are no different from the Democrats - and they all (but one) share the following common ground: they stick with divisive issues and don't address the primary oath of the Constitution, and all but one drools over BIG GOVERNMENT.

    I'd like to hear those asking these canned questions change to topics of the Constitution instead of all of the divisive issues - most all having to do with some level of socialism. For example:

    Senator Hilary Clinton's admission that she's a socialist goes against everything our Constitution stands for since the framers did not intend for BIG GOVERNMENT to be dominating the population, yet socialistic principles cannot exist without BIG GOVERNMENT.

    Senator John McCain (and others) stance to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens - law breakers - goes against our Constitution. McCain is a looser as far as I'm concerned because he continues to fall back on his POW status - something about 40 years old. He's out of touch with today.

    Mayor Giuliani's support of sanctuary cities and federally funded abortion is totally unconstitutional, yet both issues are highly divisive and supports BIG GOVERNMENT.

    Governor Romney thinks the federal BIG GOVERNMENT should mandate morality - something totally absent from our Constitution - and for good reason. BIG GOVERNMENT should NOT dictate what is moral or not. Romney also thinks the USA should be the global police force - totally unconstitutional.

    Only Ron Paul has a track record of trying to reduce BIG GOVERNMENT, and only Ron Paul seems to know that America has become divisive because of the ever increasing interference of the BIG USA GOVERNMENT both at home and in the world. I would guess that 50% of the divisive problems in our country would disappear if politicians reverted back to serving the mandates of the Constitution instead of trying to achieve more votes, having their votes and influence bought (both Republicans and Democrats), and playing the charity givers with billions of dollars of the hard-earned monies of the American taxpayers.


    Thursday, October 18, 2007

    Outsourcing: BIG GOVERNMENT


    From customer support to reading X-Rays almost everything that can be done is being outsourced to some country other than the parent company's home country. In the USA the decision to outsource is triggered by various reasons and the next few Thursday posts will cover some of these key reasons.

    BIG GOVERNMENT is a huge reason a company will outsource. Government's intrusion into business enterprise has grown - and continues to grow - at an unprecedented pace. Companies have had to redirect precious resources just to manage government bureaucracy and government dictated employee regulations.

    In the State of Oregon, starting next year, employers in the state or planning to come to Oregon will be forced by government to hire and retain homosexuals, transvestites, cross-dressers, and whatever sexual deviant that might come knocking on their employment door. (Passed by Democrats in the legislature and the Democrat Governor).

    If you already have one employed come January 1 they might show up looking allot different - and there is nothing you will be able to do about it because the State of Oregon will force you to accept deviants - you have no choice. Democrats have granted greater rights to one group and less rights to another. That salesman that interacts with your customers might show up with a wig and heavy padded bra - and there won't be a damn thing you can do - your rights have been deleted. Good reason not to relocate your business to Oregon!

    Countrywide, here's a fraction of BIG GOVERNMENT bureaucracy you are forced to endure:
    • Forced to hire a person based on religion, sex, or national origin - even if others are more qualified! (Civil rights Act)
    • Forced to hire and keep workers that are on the growing "disabled" list - including obesity (Rehabilitation Act of 1973)
    • Forced to accommodate pregnancies and retain jobs after women that choose to get pregnant eventually return and demand their job back (Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978)
    • Forced to accommodate religious practices and holidays even if you are against them (EEOC)
    • Forced to pay employees that have no skills an amount dictated by BIG GOVERNMENT (Min. Wage Act)
    Outsourcing removes much of the BIG GOVERNMENT from business and allows the business to focus on their marketplace instead of government controls. Until BIG GOVERNMENT is removed from the workplace it is best to avoid the hassles and simply outsource as much as possible.

    Want to post compliance posters for your company within your state? Click here and OBEY - it is MANDATORY that you post them!