A Better Choice

Let's not elect another big government President like McCain or Obama. If you are Republican or Democrat and have realized your party has abandoned you like I've come to realize, know we have another choice.

Bob Barr For President - 2008

---

---

How People Vote

1: Analytical Voting
A voter will consider the position of the candidate and how their philosophy will impact the short and long term consequences of the country. This voter is not swayed by superficial appearances and takes the facts of the candidate's past record and professional (non-celebrity) endorsements.

--1a: Believing government should be first - The voter, after analysis, will choose a candidate that will bring bigger government and more government control to the country. They do not believe in individual achievement or the freedom of spirit, but knowingly chooses oppressive control by government and unions. Mr. Obama (endorsed by Mr. Union - T. Kennedy) or Mrs. Clinton, a self-proclaimed socialist, would be your ideal choices.

--1b: Believing people should be first - The voter, after analysis, will choose a candidate that will bring smaller and less oppressive government to the country. Individual choice and freedom are the priorities and belief in individual responsibility and individual achievement are the goals. Representative Dr. Ron Paul is your best choice, followed by former Governor Romney.

2: Fuzzy Voting
These voters choose their candidate based on who best gives them a cozy fuzzy feeling. This choice is totally superficial and based on attributes such as looks, age, race, sex, or which celebrity happens to endorse them. Totally ignorant of policy results that would impact the country this voter is a sucker for words and appearance.

3: Total Retard Voting
These groups of voters are unable to think on their own. They vote however their union tells them to vote, or how their party of choice tells them to vote. This group also encompasses illegal aliens that register to vote just to vote for a candidate that will give them amnesty, totally ignorant of policies that impact the country. Most of these voters are low income - probably because they are so stupid. 100% of this group is incapable or unwilling to achieve anything on their own and want a candidate that will promise them all sorts of government handouts.

Which are you?

Are You Stimulated?

If you think the so-called stimulus plan will turn the economy around think again. Putting the Federal government further into debt is not the solution, yet politicians are happily working together to bring to consumers (voters) all the money they can in an election year.

People on the upper end of the scale will probably invest their money - not spend it.

People on the bottom end of the scale will spend it on stuff those people typically buy - cigarettes, junk food, candy, and diapers for all the children they pump into society that they can't afford. This is another BAD idea with the current "stimulus" plan - it encourages these retards to pump out even more children since the government is willing to give them more money for more kids.

Hmmm - maybe it's the government that is the retarded ones and the poor smarter than we think! What should have been done was to give $5,000 to the poor and subtract $500 for each child they have. Government needs to encourage those that are social burdens to close their legs not spread them.

People shouldn't be paying the taxes they currently pay - and it's because of so much government waste, so many failed government programs that cost billions (like the DEA which I will post on soon), and the Dept. of Education, and others - including billions in giveaways to countries that are bottomless pits.

Dr. Ron Paul has his Four-Point Plan, and it means less government, reduced tax burden, reduces spending, and actions to promote more jobs and economic growth. Liberals on both sides don't like this plan because it calls for smaller government and less socialism.

---

Expect the most liberal cities to take advantage of this stimulus package with new and innovative taxes! If you live in a liberal-controlled city you will not escape your destiny! Don't complain to me - you voted them in!

---

---

The Game Of Gas

Oil, the oil industry, and the entire concept of energy independence has been nothing but a huge scam on the American consumers. For decades both Republicans and Democrats have promised energy independence and lofty goals of new sustainable energy. Let's look at some that Lawrence Dickerson from Offshore-mag.com recalls

Republican President Richard Nixon, January 1974, when our nation was importing 35% of our oil:

Let this be our national goal: At the end of the decade, in the year 1980, the United States will not be dependent on any other country for the energy we need to provide our jobs, to heat our homes, and to keep our transportation going.

Democrat President Jimmy "oil lines" Carter, 1979's Crisis of Confidence Speech, our nation importing over 48% of our oil:

I am tonight setting a clear goal for the energy policy of the United States. Beginning this moment, the nation will never use more foreign oil than we did in 1977 - never.

Republican President George H. W. Bush, 1991, in his National Energy Strategy:

When our administration developed our national energy strategy, three principles guided our policy: reducing our dependence on foreign oil, protecting our environment, and promoting economic growth.

By 1993, our oil imports reached 50%.

Democrat President William Clinton, June 2000 letter:

With so much attention focused on the recent spike in gasoline prices and OPEC's decision to increase production quotas, it is critical that we not lose sight of our nation's long-term energy needs. For seven years, my Administration has pursued a sound, comprehensive policy to address those needs.

Empty promises from both sides - and still these empty promises continue in the debates. Politicians lie about energy. Energy issues make for great political talk - and promises never kept. As far as gas goes, every government from local to federal makes huge amounts of money off of oil sales - do you really think politicians want to see that revenue stream dry up? (Oregon was the first with a gas tax).

My steps to energy independence:

1. Allow offshore drilling in American territories - much safer than transporting oil in ships. Once we even announced this expect OPEC to drop oil prices dramatically.
2. Assess a 10% requirement (NOT A TAX) on oil company gross profits that would be need be spent on new energy research and development. Anything new that generates energy or improvements to efficiency to current technologies. The energy R&D must be for non-combustible technologies.
3. Assess a "frivolous gas device" fee of 10% of the sales price for worthless gas devices where alternatives exist. At the top of the list would be gas blowers often used by landscape companies to blow leaves onto someone else's property.
4. Restart nuclear power plants. Safe, efficient, and cost-effective yet environmental extremists have kept such clean sources of power from being built for over 30 years.
   

Those are just a start, I'm sure you could think of many more. Just watch the candidates on both sides of the isle make promises about energy independence. My readers will be informed that it's just the same old BS.

To put JFK's space challenge into the goal of energy independence and new energy technologies:

We choose to discover new energy technologies in this decade, and do the other things -- not because they are easy; but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills; because that challenge is one that we're willing to accept; one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win -- and the others, too.

So let's stop advancing more red tape, more bureaucracy, more taxes and let's set some hard-core technology goals to achieve. It will never be solved by BIG GOVERNMENT or by the UN.

Of Fires, Stupidity, and Hate

No wonder our country appears to be in such havoc - we have too many stupid "leaders" making decisions.

For example, take liberal Senator Harry Reid's statement:

One reason why we have the fires in California is global warming

I mean, really - what a careless total lie. I use to live down yonder and fires in S. Cal. are as normal as ocean waves. I lived with Santa Ana winds. I've lived very close to mountains glowing red at night, breathing in smoke, ash on the vehicles - I've seen it all. It's nothing new - except to stupid idiots like Harry Reid that need to be under medical care for dementia.

It is notable the difference between shelters in California vs. those in Katrina times. Demographics and political control make a difference. In liberal-dominated New Orleans you had raging hate, rapes, murders, assaults, property crimes, total havoc - and thousands running around like rabid beasts not knowing what to do, hands stretched out demanding BIG GOVERNMENT take care of them.

Then you have the extortionist unions claiming:

Quite frankly, our members are the only thing keeping the state from going up in flames.

Unreal huh? Every wacko liberal-socialist entity will be playing the fires just like they do with every sad situation. But in this case, in predominately Conservative land, their "help" isn't wanted nor is their politicalizing the situation. California is not liberal Louisiana.

Then you have S. California. People just chill'n, comfortable (yet inconvenient) shelters with plenty to eat and drink, people taking care of themselves (while liberals are running around screaming with a stop watch demanding the federal government do something fast). Where crime was rampant at shelters in one demographic, massages, yoga, and Kosher food are the daily fare with another demographic.

---

Then you have (self-professed) socialists like Hilary Clinton and their hate groups, one of which is deceptively called Center for American Progress Action Fund. One of their posts today targeted Islamo-fascism week - of which they hatefully rename as "Islamo-phobic Awareness Week". They use all the guilt-motivation techniques liberals are known for - labeling anyone speaking truth as "racist", "campaigners of hate", "offensive" - you get the drift. No wonder Muslims - including each of their most radical and murderous members - are doing everything they can to ensure liberals get power in our government.

One can only hope the legal voters in America are not as stupid as these "leaders".

---

There is some good news today. That vicious black judge, Roy L. Pearson Jr., might be losing his job. You remember him as the mean black judge that used his position of authority to oppress and bring terror and a $65 Million lawsuit (later changed to $54 M) against a simple hardworking Oriental couple that owned Custom Cleaners. His raging hate eventually failed.

The Divided Dumb

---

By the way, today starts Islamo-Fascism Awareness week!

---

I didn't waste my time with the GOP "debate", but I did check out some summaries. To me most of these candidates are no different from the Democrats - and they all (but one) share the following common ground: they stick with divisive issues and don't address the primary oath of the Constitution, and all but one drools over BIG GOVERNMENT.

I'd like to hear those asking these canned questions change to topics of the Constitution instead of all of the divisive issues - most all having to do with some level of socialism. For example:

Senator Hilary Clinton's admission that she's a socialist goes against everything our Constitution stands for since the framers did not intend for BIG GOVERNMENT to be dominating the population, yet socialistic principles cannot exist without BIG GOVERNMENT.

Senator John McCain (and others) stance to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens - law breakers - goes against our Constitution. McCain is a looser as far as I'm concerned because he continues to fall back on his POW status - something about 40 years old. He's out of touch with today.

Mayor Giuliani's support of sanctuary cities and federally funded abortion is totally unconstitutional, yet both issues are highly divisive and supports BIG GOVERNMENT.

Governor Romney thinks the federal BIG GOVERNMENT should mandate morality - something totally absent from our Constitution - and for good reason. BIG GOVERNMENT should NOT dictate what is moral or not. Romney also thinks the USA should be the global police force - totally unconstitutional.

Only Ron Paul has a track record of trying to reduce BIG GOVERNMENT, and only Ron Paul seems to know that America has become divisive because of the ever increasing interference of the BIG USA GOVERNMENT both at home and in the world. I would guess that 50% of the divisive problems in our country would disappear if politicians reverted back to serving the mandates of the Constitution instead of trying to achieve more votes, having their votes and influence bought (both Republicans and Democrats), and playing the charity givers with billions of dollars of the hard-earned monies of the American taxpayers.

---

By the way, today starts Islamo-Fascism Awareness week!

---

---

Lord Government

Serf - noun: a person in a condition of servitude, required to render services to a lord, commonly attached to the lord's land and transferred with it from one owner to another; a slave.

That defines all taxpayers. We are required to work and render our money to Lord Government. When they want more, they simple resort to deception ("it's for the children") or use calamities (Katrina, bridge collapse, etc.) as a sign they need more - and more - and more - of our hard earned money.

Let's take the I-35W bridge that recently collapsed in Minneapolis, MN. This happened just a few months ago and you probably recall that afterwards, there was a cry from politicians how the infrastructure of our country was falling apart - that billions spent in Iraq were taking away from needed repairs. We heard immediate justifications for more fuel taxes, increased sales taxes, and simply more taxes. This from a bridge that was rated as "structurally deficient" back in 2005, with cracks and fatigue found in 2006.

What the politicians didn't want you to know:

The evening the bridge collapsed elected officials were gathering with the Minnesota Twins to dedicate construction of a new ballpark - financed with $392 MILLION of taxpayer money - funded by sales tax hike in Hennepin County! (The dedication was cancelled but construction was not called off) The Twins BILLIONAIRE owner is Carl Pohlad - able to pay for it himself but danced with the politicians to use almost $400 MILLION of taxpayer's money!

This is just Minnesota - yet there's more:

• 1995: Minneapolis forgives $74 million loan it made to the Timberwolves basketball team for the Target Center. Franchise asking for more aid. Translation - the taxpayers (serfs) got screwed again.
• 2000: Xcel Energy Center built for the Wild hockey team with $65 million in city bonds and a $48 million interest-free state loan, plus a $17 million payment for state high school hockey tournaments to be held there. Franchise now asking that loan be forgiven, citing Timberwolves example. Translation - the taxpayers (serfs) to get screwed again.
• 2006: State approves $136 million for new Univ. of Minnesota football stadium. Translation - the taxpayers (serfs) got screwed again.
• 2006: After failed move to Anoka County, Vikings pro football team proposes a $1 billion stadium in downtown Minneapolis. Then-NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue lobbies for public funding. Team could threaten to move to Los Angeles. Translation - the taxpayers (serfs) to be screwed again.

Minnesota is a Democrat state, yet in the meantime, Republican President Bush (who himself received stadium handouts as owner of the Texas Rangers) and Congress have called for millions of dollars to help re-build the bridge.

Remember this next time your city or state claims they need more money for roads, social services, the failing public school machine, real estate deals, sports deals, global warming, or to support the illegal aliens they provide sanctuary to. It all costs money - and every penny comes from you and I.

Ron Paul on debt and taxes:

We cannot continue to allow private banks, wasteful agencies, lobbyists, corporations on welfare, and governments collecting foreign aid to dictate the size of our ballooning budget. We need a new method to prioritize our spending. It's called the Constitution of the United States.

Your New Pharmacist - Uncle Sam

In the continued pursuit of bigger, more controlling, and oppressive government, Senator Kennedy, along with a couple of big government Republicans, have proposed legislation that will put the Federal government in control of your prescriptions. It will take away individual choices - even deny your access to critical medications!

If you don't already know the simple equation:

Less choices = Less freedom
More choices = Greater freedom

I don't mean the current doctor-required prescription to obtain a drug, but I mean the millions of people that depend on doctors and pharmacists that mixing certain drugs for people that have conditions where no over-the-counter drug exists. This legislation, once introduced and passed, will stop that practice by the people that know best - and replace it with one where the FDA will decide if you need a certain drug. Your personal medical needs - under the control of big government bureaucracy.

Like many BIG GOVERNMENT attempts to become bigger this proposed legislation, the Safe Drug Compounding Act of 2007, is presented as something in the interest of public safety. Hmmm - we seem to be hearing that phrased used more and more - from making new laws to control the people to raising taxes - "public safety". The people of the USA must see the reality of BIG GOVERNMENT - look beyond the marketing pitch - that is for our own good. Whether Republican or Democrat the promoters of BIG GOVERNMENT must be voted out of office in favor of whoever would support smaller government.

You can do an internet search for ways to contact your Senator, or use this link from the HealthFreedom.com site. Be direct, be firm - you don't want BIG GOVERNMENT to come between you and your doctor.