Showing posts with label Natzi Pelosi. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label Natzi Pelosi. Show all posts

    Thursday, September 13, 2007

    Give The Democrats Credit


    I don't want to seem lop-sided in my posts so today I want to bring credit to the Democrats for the following:

    1. In an article yesterday - Colombia blasts US Democrats on aid - Seems like Republicans pumped money into Columbia to help destroy drug crops and the Democrats have slashed that program. Let's hear it for the Democrats - always willing to help drug traffickers!

    2. Democrat judges of the 9th Circuit Court are forcing the removal of a solitary Roman cross from a World War 1 veterans memorial in California's Mojave Desert - there for 75 years. Let's hear it for the Democrats - always willing to "show support" for the troops - even the dead ones that died for God and Country.

    3. Four star General Petraeus was elected by the Democrat Congress to check out Iraq. General Petraeus was mandated by the Democrat Congress to report back to them in September. General Petraeus did not provide the doom-and-gloom report the Democrat Congress wanted to hear - so they attacked him personally and professionally and made so many false accusations against this soldier. Let's hear it for the Democrats - always willing to personally attack when truth dares show its head!

    4. Key Democrats vow to block Bush's nominee to succeed Alberto Gonzales (you remember Alberto - the Democrats hounded him out of office). Ted Olson might have a tough fight getting the nomination. Democrats hate him and I understand why. On the top of the list he represented Paula Jones (you remember her as one of Bill Clinton's many sexual subordinates) in her sex harassment suit against (then) President Clinton. He also carries too much patriotic baggage since his wife was murdered by Muslim hijackers in the 9/11 attacks (on that plane that was flown into the Pentagon). Let's hear it for the Democrats - always willing to suppress patriotic lawyers that dared go against one of their own!

    5. The Democrat Congress, not wanting to be undone by Republicans, recently approved changes to the 1978 FISA which allows the NSA to monitor domestic conversations and emails and provides the legal standing for "CIA Cell Tower" construction. Let's hear it for the Democrats - who better to advance BIG GOVERNMENT! (Haa Haa Haa - did you really think they cared about your rights?)

    6. Speaking of BIG GOVERNMENT Democrats are stepping up pressure on the Bush administration to show that BIG GOVERNMENT is (or should be) Mighty Mouse when it comes to the so-called subprime mortgages. When you realize these mortgages were given to people that really weren't qualified by regular financial institutions to get a home loan you can see Democrats want to use taxpayer money to help these same unqualified people keep the homes they wouldn't have had in the first place.

      If you're a responsible home owner you should be asking why Democrats are willing to help unqualified people when they never came to your aid.

      If you're a renter you should really be pissed the Democrats want to use your tax $$$ so unqualified people can keep a home while you still have to rent. Let's hear it for the Democrats - always willing to use other people's money to buy votes!

    Saturday, August 04, 2007

    The Democrat's Incestuous Relationship


    In an unprecedented move that highlights an incestuous relationship between the Democrat Party and Big Labor, the Democrats have offered their nationwide response to President Bush's radio address to the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).
    "Unprecedented" = First Time, never before.

    Nancy Pelosi did say Democrats would make history.

    Democrats in bed with unions?

    Unions speaking for Democrats?

    Unions pulling the strings of Democrats?

    Oh tell me it ain't so!

    Read it here.

    Look for, that union label...

    Tuesday, June 05, 2007

    Another Corrupt Democrat Exposed

    Black Louisiana congressman William Jefferson was finally indicted on corruption (in the order of millions) charges. He claims he is innocent but he's guilty as hell. His "defense" will be that evidence previously obtained by prosecutors from his congressional office was inadmissible.

    This is how criminals defend themselves - by trying to throw out facts and truth and evidence and get off on technicalities.

    What a joke for Natzi Pelosi to appoint him to the small business and ethics committee. But all of these liberals are criminals and pervayors of perversion so it's no surprise - until they are caught.

    Now
    I want white woman Senator (from Mexifornia) Dianne Feinstein to be investigated for her corruption. She already abandoned her responsibilities with the Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee (MILCON) when a report came out linking her husband's ownership of two major defense contractors receiving BILLIONS of tax payers' dollars in construction contracts - approved and appropriated by her.

    Wednesday, May 09, 2007

    Fort Dix - No Surprises

    The CAIR site frontlines worries that Muslims fear backlash from Fort Dix Plot, yet no where on their site do they say anything about how deplorable this plot was.

    NOWHERE does CAIR, the public relations arm for terrorism in the USA, denounce such actions by Muslims.

    NOWHERE does CAIR, the public relations arm for terrorism in the USA, take a stand against jihad in the USA nor do they promote peace.

    I intentionally sat through several broadcasts yesterday and today on CNN and at NO TIME did their "reporters" mention the terrorists were Muslims. They mentioned they were "men", they mentioned some of the countries represented, but they continue to hide the truth and reality.

    Any liberal want to challenge me on the fact that liberal-controlled media HIDES THE TRUTH FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE?

    No, didn't think so. It's hard to debate reality. And there are still uncaptured Muslims that were in that suicide video that have yet to be captured - freely running about.... maybe they will plot an attack in Atlanta, at the CNN headquarters someday?

    Tuesday, May 08, 2007

    Muslim Terrorsts In The USA? Of Course!


    This thwarted terrorist attack against American soldiers, upon US soil, was predicated by me. Ever since I started this blog I've been pro-active in warning the public about Muslims.

    I credit Fox News for being the first to announce these 6 scumbags were indeed Muslim males (not men, just males by gender) at the same time CNN, CBS, NBC, and the rest of the liberal media tried to hide these facts.

    They appeared to be your run-of-the-mill pizza delivery Muslim, your convenient store Muslim, etc. - in this country don't expect them to appear on the streets with signs on them identifying themselves as the militant arm of Islam. They are instructed by Muslim organizations like CAIR to blend in.

    Qur'an: 47:4 -
    When you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle (fighting Jihad in Allah's Cause), smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them. At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, bind them firmly, making (them) captives. Thereafter either generosity or ransom (them based upon what benefits Islam) until the war lays down its burdens.

    Thus are you commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam.
    It will happen again - and again - and again. So far the 8,247+ Islamic attacks and over 20,000 murdered by Muslim militants have been off US soil, leaving citizens of the USA to focus their concerns over whether Paris Hilton will or will not go to jail.

    My prediction? Attacks will be attempted more frequently. Expect Muslims to focus on targets that will generate more terror - especially settings where large groups of people are grouped and somewhat trapped - sports events, theaters, schools, etc.

    Now it's time for the Muslim PR organizations like CAIR to do some damage control. It's time for liberals to declare this was an isolated incident and warn against profiling.

    Wednesday, April 11, 2007

    Creeping Disease or Common Sense?


    For past decades the term disease has been applied to a person's behavior. It is a clever yet obvious motivation technique that attempts to alter a person's behavior. For example, an obese person isn't just overweight because they shovel too much down their throat - they have a disease. In this application the person is relieved of person responsibility for their behavior.

    Now, Muslims have applied this age-old manipulation technique to non-Muslims. From an article last month at Middle East Online: Islamophobia: A Call to Confronting a Creeping Disease. The article starts by blaming President Bush then continues with Rupert Murdock. They go on and on attempting to divert reality - yet they never says anything about (less than half of murders this month alone):
    • 4/11/07 - Yala, Thailand - 26 y/o Buddhist woman burned alive by Muslims
    • 4/11/07 - Yala, Thailand - 19 y/o Buddhist man and his mom gunned down by Muslims
    • 4/11/07 - Narathiwat, Thailand - 50 y/o man murdered by Muslims
    • 4/10/07 - Srinagar, India - Shoekeeper murdered by Mujahideen (Muslims)
    • 4/10/07 - Muqdadiyah, Iraq - 21 murdered by Muslims
    • 4/8/07 - Baghdad, Iraq - 24 murdered by Muslims
    • 4/7/07 - Parang, Philippines - 10 people murdered by Muslims
    • In 2006, 16,791 Iraqi civilians have been murdered my Muslims - just 1 year
    • In April 2007, 438 have been murdered by Muslims - and the month isn't even half over.
    There are the Muslims that are the front line executioners, and the rest that fund the Islamic machine and cover for them - and are charged with public relations (like CAIR). There are the Muslims that help to strengthen their base by forming alliances with liberal governments and unions.

    Disease? I think not. Common sense? Yep!

    Thursday, April 05, 2007

    Intelligence Test


    To make this as simple as possible the following 10 questions require simple Yes or No answers. Total them up and rate your results using the rating criteria at the end of the test. Good luck.
    1. You think Iran President Ahmadinejad comes close to diety, and he is full of heart-felt grace and compassion. [Yes] or [No]

    2. You agree with the Democrat mandate to abolish the phrase Global War on Terror because there is no global terror threat. [Yes] or [No]

    3. You believe minimum wages provide incentives for businesses to succeed and thus hire even more unskilled workers. [Yes] or [No]

    4. You believe Democrats want to advance an agenda of less government and restoring personal freedoms. [Yes] or [No]

    5. You believe Democrats will not take as much money from you in the form of taxes, or indirectly by increasing taxes on businesses you rely on (and thus increasing your cost) - despite hard calculations taxes will double on middle class families. [Yes] or [No]

    6. You have received global warming atonement by purchasing carbon offsets. [Yes] or [No]

    7. You are against school vouchers and don't believe parents should have a choice who educates their children. You believe the hope for generations to come can only be realized via the public school system. [Yes] or [No]

    8. You believe you are responsible for the health cost of a smoker, of a person that stuffs themselves and are obese, and all people that choose to eat poor and not care for their bodies. [Yes] or [No]

    9. You believe Muslims are not a threat. [Yes] or [No]

    10. When you see Rosie O'Donnell you see cute little Mickey Mouse. [Yes] or [No]
    Scoring: If you answered [Yes] one or more questions then consider yourself a helpless idiot.

    Monday, March 19, 2007

    Same Old Anti-Child Democrap


    Natzi Pelosi et al wants to remove testing of preschoolers in the public school arena. Why? Because it is what the powerful teacher unions want, and we all know Democrats are just puppets of the union bosses.

    Why do teacher unions want such academic skills testing trashed? Because it can be used as a base line to determine academic progress through the over-funded, under-achieving public school monolith monster. With proof of slow and poor achievement available it puts union workers (bad teachers) in the spotlight - something unions don't want.

    Just more proof that this Democrat Congress is union controlled.

    Just more proof that this Democrat Congress puts unions ahead of children.

    Just more proof that when it comes to the policy of Democrats, dumber children are better than weak unions.

    Wednesday, March 14, 2007

    Democrats Are Such An Odd Clan


    Democrats never fail to amuse me and disappoint the nation. Full of lies and deceptions and agendas of crushing core values America was built on, they are so obvious with their hypocrisy. A few examples for today:

    Democrats are calling for the head of AG Alberto Gonzales. I'm flooded with emails from Democrat sites urging emails and phone calls to pressure representatives to fire Gonzales. Senator Hillary Clinton wants Gonzales to resign - she demands it. I challenge even one Democrat to document where this outrage was when Bill Clinton fired all 93 U.S. attorneys when he was President. The hypocrisy and lies of Democrats.

    Democrats claim to be advocates of free speech. When General Pace called homosexuality immoral the Democrats whined and cried and demanded an apology (since Democrats see homosexuality as perfectly normal). Democrats put on a face of protecting free speech - if and only if it's speech approved by them. Don't you dare surrender General! The hypocrisy and lies of Democrats.

    Democrats claim to be a family-oriented bunch. They claim they want the best for children. The unionized Democrat public school system in Deerfield Illinois forced their 14-year-old freshmen class into a homosexual indoctrination seminar after forcing them to sign a confidentiality agreement not to tell their parents. Typical Democrats - teach the youth of America homosexuality is normal and try to detach the children from their parents. The hypocrisy and lies of Democrats.

    Democrats put on an act pretending to care about the legitimacy of elections. In reality, they are totally against legal elections and their liberal thugs in positions as judges help enforce their dirty deeds. Hillary Clinton in on record she wants felons (she knows many) to have the right to vote. Now, Democrats in Minnesota want to give non-citizens the "right" to vote. The hypocrisy and lies of Democrats.
    Happy Pi Day! (Brainy readers will know what I mean)

    Friday, March 09, 2007

    Thank A Liberal

    Federal payments to Oregon might get vetoed by President Bush. Why? Because the defeatist liberals thought they would stick troop withdrawal conditions to this spending bill.

    Yes, Liberals - in their usual political maneuvers to micro-manage the military in Iraq and Afghanistan - might have screwed Oregon using union-like extortion tactics. (Unions own Democrats in case you didn't already know)

    So why did Liberals sabotage the chance for Oregon to receive this money?

    Because they are Liberals and they don't care about anyone else - they care only for their agenda.

    Lane County residents - make sure you still sign the anti-income tax petition tomorrow!

    Tuesday, March 06, 2007

    Faggot


    Unfortunately Ann Coulter had to stoop to the level of your typical liberal when she used the word faggot. A superior conservative intellect would have brought up some disturbing fact about Edwards - maybe something related to his past as an ambulance chasing lawyer.

    Now when I hear the word faggot I don't think of homosexuals, I think of a bundle of wood - a very legitimate usage of the word faggot. What I found lame and offensive was the reaction to a word by both sides of the aisle.

    I heard a bit of Bill O'Reilly on the radio yesterday while taking a shower after my run. I was amazed by Mr. O'Reilly's self-surrender into the world of liberal-induced wimpism when I heard him talking about Coulter and the "f-word". He couldn't bring himself to use the word "faggot" - choosing instead "the f-word". What a wimp. What a fearful person O'Reilly shows himself to be when he fears a word.

    This is what liberals want. This is what liberals are achieving. They and their special interest groups pick words and phrases and label them as "hate words", "offensive", "pejorative".

    Leaders and people in high visibility positions both living in fear they might be caught saying a word, especially a slang word or one with different meanings. The same ready to pounce on anyone that happens to use selected words or phrases some special interest group has labeled as "mean" and "uncompassionate".

    Then it hit me. Coulter was just being goofy and trying to make a funny. Everyone else swings into greed mode. O'Reilly refuses to say "faggot" because he is afraid it might hurt his ratings and book sales.

    Democrats jump on the bandwagon to denounce the use of the word "faggot" (although they have no problem calling the President Hitler) so they can appear more loving and compassionate.

    It's all a joke. It's all about securing as many voters for the next time around. It's all about protecting your current and future customers and viewers.

    Then I have to ask - Will intelligence ever come back to politics? Will securing our nation or educating our children ever become a priority over interpretations of words?

    Wednesday, February 21, 2007

    Tony Blair's Wise Decision


    The Democrats are having goose bumps over the news that Great Britain is withdrawing some troops from Iraq. Not a full withdrawn - more like a downsizing. Is this wise?

    For Tony Blair it probably is. Great Britain's big mistake was allowing so many Muslims to migrate to their country. I guess Britain thought they were being compassionate and kind, but in reality they allowed themselves to be blinded by the reality of Islam.

    Islamist Abu Izzadeen, well known terrorist, said (talking about Britain):
    I'm born here... We have a British passport, and British citizenship but our allegiance is only to Islam.

    ... I have no allegiance to the British queen whatsoever and to the British society - in fact, if I see Mujahadin attack the UK, I always stand on the side of the Muslims - NEVER against the Muslims... Never! ... we always stand with the Muslims, regardless of the consequences."

    If the British public don't like Shariah, it's going to be over their noses, whether they like it or not. It's going to be over Tony Blair's nose and George Bush's nose as well - and for your information - the British government knows that. That's why they're so terrified of Islamists. I don't believe in freedom. ... We don't believe in freedom as Muslims. We believe we are, and every action is, restricted with the Shariah rules....
    This is the real Islam. This is how every Muslim thinks - each and every one. It's an irrevocable part of Islam. If they are not an active jihadist then they support the militant arm with money, public opinion, whatever it takes to achieve their ultimate goal.

    Gear up your own country Tony Blair - before it's too late!

    Tuesday, February 20, 2007

    Democrats Right? It Must Be A Civil War!


    The figures are staggering and now I can only conclude that liberals have been right all along. Consider these facts from the previous two years:

    In 2004 there were 16,148 murders. It doesn't matter how - guns, knives, bombs, etc. - when you've been murdered or know of someone murdered does the method really matter anymore? Then last year, 2005, that number increased to 16,692 murdered. In case you don't have your calculator handy that's a total of 32,740 murdered in just the past 2 years.

    Many were murdered by those that invaded the country. Others murdered by their own countrymen. Murder is murder. You or your loved one are dead. Period.

    Then the violence - awful violence. In the last 2 years the number of reported forcible rapes was 189,023. Innocent women, even underage girls - raped against their will. Horrible crimes.

    Much of their violence doesn't get reported - like violent assaults. In 2004 there were 847,381 violent assaults and last year that number grew to 862,947 violent assaults. Add that up and you have 1,710,328 violent assaults in the past 2 years. Does that sound like people in that country are safe to walk in their own streets?

    So by liberal logic we need to pull out now - pull out of America, because these are part of the FBI crime statistics for the United States of America. Obviously Iraq is a safer place to live.

    I've seen no "peace protesters" with signs marching against criminals in the USA. I've not seen any child protection group protesting these crime rates. I've seen little being done to halt and reverse the invasion of illegal aliens (criminals) into our country - perpetrators of a huge part of these awful crimes.

    But hey - our federal and state governments are attacking trans-fats and cell phones!

    Tuesday, February 06, 2007

    Same Old Democrat Deception: Voting



    Yesterday Democrat Representative Rush Hold (New Jersey) introduced a bill that is supposed to keep electronic elections honest. Called Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act (caution - Democrat/Socialist link given) it addresses absolutely nothing regarding voter fraud. His key points:
    • Paper Ballots -- ALL voting machines must produce a paper ballot
    • Audits -- ALL voting machines must be audit-able
    • No Secret Source Code -- ALL voting machine vendors MUST make the machines' software available for inspection
    • Ban on Wireless Devices -- Prohibits wireless technology in voting machines
    • Access for All Eligible Voters -- Ensures disabled and minority language voters can vote privately and independently
    What this Democrat has left out - as ALL Democrats do when addressing voting issues - is the legitimacy of the voter.

    What the Democrats will never sign on to:
    • Proof the person is not a felon
    • A 1 person = 1 vote verification
    • Proof the person at the voting machine really is that person (identity check)
    • Proof the voter has a legal right to vote (not an illegal alien, dead person, etc.)
    Have you ever - ever - ever seen Democrats demand honesty in the person doing the vote? NO! And you never will. Their constituency are illegal aliens, felons (Hillary even has said felons should be allowed to vote), repeat voters, voters using the identity of dead people, and whatever other illegal tactics only they know of.

    Then there is Senator Barack Obama's bill (S.1975) called Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2005. Talk about "deceptive practices" - this surely is, for it - like ALL Democrat voting-related legislation - does absolutely NOTHING to address illegal votes. Just more Democrat deception and lies.

    Democrats will always try and put the fault and blame on someone (or something) other than the core problem. Democrats caring about honest elections? What a joke that is! They are experts in deception - using quaint terms and phrases like "disenfranchised voters", "our citizens have lost confidence that their votes are counted accurately", "election reform", "election protection" - all to divert attention from the biggest problem when it comes to elections.

    Democrats need those illegal votes - they can not survive without them, and that - very simply - is why they never have, nor ever will, address that issue.

    Happy birthday remembrances today to Ronald Regan - perhaps the best President the USA ever had.

    Tuesday, January 30, 2007

    Enforce Responsibility - Graffiti


    I'm all for personal responsibility. I'm all for law enforcement. But what about scenarios where law enforcement fails to act. What should be done when one or two individuals in higher positions orders the rank in file to NOT enforce law and order?

    In the case of the war protesters that descended upon the U.S. Capitol and spray painted anarchist symbols on the steps of the U.S. Capital, federal police were forced - under orders from their liberal superiors - not to take any action.

    So who should pay for the cleanup? I say the U.S. Capitol Police Chief should pay out of his own pocket for the clean up he failed to prohibit. It was his duty - his call - his responsibility.

    Now once again, the taxpayer will be the ones that pay for the crimes that others commit. Once again, these anarchist freaks are left untouched - no arrests made.

    Our Capital has been attacked - this time not by a plane, but with paint. Let's watch and see Natzi Pelosi's action - if any. Can she even protect the national monument where she works? If not, how can she protect a nation?

    Pay up Chief Morse!

    Friday, January 26, 2007

    Seductive Wet Voluptuous Sexual Desires


    Ever since animal life existed on Earth the urge to procreate has been a priority. With humans the urge often starts with the visual - curves, breasts, lips, an open mouth exposing a bit of tongue, legs, a tight ass, a pucker, those sensuous and inviting eyes, muscles in the right places, a fit and toned bod - all sorts of visual cues to get the hormones flowing.

    Seems like the best way to get the attention of many Americans. Now that I got your attention I have to ask if you even care about the rising crime in our country. Illegal aliens - by their very existence in our country - are guilty of a crime. Many here are immigration fugitives - ignoring orders of deportation by our justice system.

    According to Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who's on the Immigration Subcommittee, most illegals are young men from countries with high crime rates and criminal aliens make up 28 percent of those in federal prisons. King estimates that about 4,800 people are murdered and 3,000 children molested a year in this country by illegal aliens, people who are not supposed to be here.

    The Washington Times reported way back in 2004:
    About 80,000 illegal criminal aliens, including convicted murderers, rapists, drug dealers and child molesters who served prison time and were released, are loose on the streets of America, hiding from federal immigration authorities.
    Those numbers reflected the ones that were caught - just think how much that count has increased since 2004 and what magnitude more are there that have not been caught.

    Over 21,900 Americans murdered since 9/11 - far more than all of the US soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined - yet there is silence. I have not seen any protests about these innocent lives taken. I have not heard Natzi Pelosi take one single step to address the 2,920 children annually that are sexually abused by illegal aliens - yet she spews the illusion of caring for the children.

    They call themselves Progressive Democrats. Yeah, progressing American toward destruction.